In 1999, Butler Lampson gave a talk about the past and future of "computer systems research" [PDF]. Here are his opinions from 1999 on "what worked".
Yes
Virtual memory
Address spaces
Packet nets
Objects / subtypes
RDB and SQL
Transactions
Bitmaps and GUIs
Web
AlgorithmsMaybe
Parallelism
RISC
Garbage collection
ReuseNo
Capabilities
Fancy type systems
Functional programming
Formal methods
Software engineering
RPC
Distributed computing
SecurityBasically everything that was a Yes in 1999 is still important today.
The article is a current snapshot on those issues. Do you agree?
(Score: 2) by mendax on Monday November 30 2015, @08:20PM
Having taken a Java job in the past what can I say? I love Java in principle, but only for projects where it makes sense. If you're forced to use the JVM and JRE, there's Groovy, Scala, and Jython. With Groovy, you can write old-fashioned procedural code to your heart's content without a hint of the OO underpinnings. In fact, I love Groovy because of that simplicity. It makes it easy to write something "in Java" that is quick and dirty without having to deal with the other shit. Oh, and Groovy and its closures let you do all the functional programming you want, even if it makes absolutely no sense.
It's really quite a simple choice: Life, Death, or Los Angeles.