Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 14 submissions in the queue.
posted by CoolHand on Sunday December 06 2015, @06:34AM   Printer-friendly
from the heeding-forced-out-failures dept.

Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella was busy explaining to a stock holders meeting that the company's plan to improve the Windows Phone's sales was to appeal to Windows developers by allowing them to write universal applications that work on computers, phones and tablets, targeting a larger array of devices than just Microsoft's handsets.

Steve Ballmer, still a major stock holder, blurts out

"That won't work, Instead, the company needs to enable Windows Phones to run Android apps."

He was possibly right, but the outburst was about as welcome as a cactus in an outhouse.

The Application market for Windows phone is a mess. If it is free, Facebook, Skype, Twitter, it gets downloaded. If the developer charge much of anything at all, apps just don't sell. And developers just aren't spending any time developing for Windows Mobile.

It's not clear exactly what Ballmer meant by his comments, however. Was he implying that Windows Phones need to run apps that were originally designed for Android, and then ported over to Windows? In that case, he's probably aware that Project Astoria, the Windows "bridge" tool that will allow developers to port Android apps to Windows, has been reportedly put on hold.


Original Submission

Ballmer's cryptic comment could also imply that he thinks an emulation layer might be the best bet.

But there is a third option: As strange as it sounds, a Windows-branded Android phone might not be so far-fetched.

The Fine Article at PCWorld goes on to explain that Android is mostly Open Source. And Microsoft could fork Android just like Amazon did, just like Barns and Nobel did, and then simply put a Windows Skin on it and substitute their own app store for Google's app store.

Reports are that the Windows Phone is not actually horrible. But it is still unloved.
Does anyone here believe this would work? Has Microsoft waited too long?

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by tibman on Sunday December 06 2015, @09:06PM

    by tibman (134) Subscriber Badge on Sunday December 06 2015, @09:06PM (#272574)

    They still don't get it. It isn't just about apps or their price. Microsoft has had phone platforms before with an app marketplace. They completely abandoned it and jettisoned all the users. So those who did buy apps could no longer download them. Users could no longer download anything at all because the marketplace went 404. That has never happened with iphone and android.

    If Microsoft really wants this to succeed then they should stop fucking with it in attempts to make it magically take more market share. Just keep upgrading the OS, devices, and apps. You know, do the hard work. If they don't axe the platform or screw it up then more people will get exposure and maybe try it out.

    --
    SN won't survive on lurkers alone. Write comments.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2