Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Sunday January 31 2016, @08:11AM   Printer-friendly
from the that's-a-little-invasive-don't-cha-think dept.

Glyn Moody reports via TechDirt

Kuwait has the dubious honor of being the first nation to require everyone's DNA--including that of visitors to the country. The Kuwait Times has a frighteningly matter-of-fact article about the plan, which is currently being put into operation. Here's how the DNA will be gathered:

Collecting samples from citizens will be done by various mobile centers that will be moved according to a special plan amongst government establishments and bodies to collect samples from citizens in the offices they work in. In addition, fixed centers will be established at the interior ministry and citizen services centers to allow citizens [to] give samples while doing various transactions.

Those who are not citizens of Kuwait will be sampled when they apply for residence permits:

Collection will done on issuing or renewing residency visas through medical examinations done by the health ministry for new residency visas and through the criminal evidence department on renewing them.

As for common-or-garden[-variety] visitors to the country:

Collection will be done at a special center at Kuwait International Airport, where in collaboration with the Civil Aviation Department, airlines, and embassies, visitors will be advised on their rights and duties towards the DNA law.

[...] The DNA will not be used for medical purposes, such as checking for genetic markers of disease, which will avoid issues of whether people should be told about their predisposition to possibly serious illnesses. Nor will the DNA database be used for "lineage or genealogical reasons". That's an important point: a complete nation's DNA would throw up many unexpected paternity and maternity results, which could have massive negative effects on the families concerned. It's precisely those kinds of practical and ethical issues that advocates of wider DNA sampling and testing need to address, but rarely do.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday January 31 2016, @04:30PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday January 31 2016, @04:30PM (#297435)

    So that would be people staying in the country on a visa or similiar.

    Besides which: The US has already been doing this for years to foreigners entering the country, and additionally has had a surrepitous dna collection program in hospitals for at least 10-15 years (it was posted on the green site way back when. In regards to a hospital in texas.)

    So while they may be the first publicly disclosing this fact, they are not actually among the first attempting it.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday January 31 2016, @04:53PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday January 31 2016, @04:53PM (#297442)

    Was curious about "surrepitous dna collection", found this posting with some references to follow:

    http://www.legalgenealogist.com/blog/2012/11/18/the-ethics-of-dna-testing/ [legalgenealogist.com]

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday January 31 2016, @09:13PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday January 31 2016, @09:13PM (#297520)

    America demands ID and credit card information of people flying *near* the US. Flying from France to Canada? Right. Hand over your personal information to the US or be refused to be boarded onto your flight.

    I am never going near the US.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday February 01 2016, @03:29AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Monday February 01 2016, @03:29AM (#297613)

      Hillary Clinton herself ordered her staff to collect DNA samples from foreign diplomats.