Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 4 submissions in the queue.
posted by NCommander on Thursday April 10 2014, @05:40PM   Printer-friendly
from the if-we-accidently-implemented-something-we-promised-is-it-still-a-bug? dept.
I'm pleased to announce that moderate then post has now been implemented. In truth, its been implemented since the last major update due to a bug. Before releasing slashcode 14.04, I was experimenting with moderate^post code on dev, and the code was merged in with the basis that it would be enabled as part of the moderation reworks. Theoretically, this code should have been disabled. In actuality, I skewed a variable; the global that controls this functionality was not 100% properly implemented.

mrcoolbp noticed the bug today, and seeing as we needed a code change either way to properly fix it, I decided to roll this bit of the moderation rework out early. I'm not thrilled on squishing two bugs in production on the same day, and I'm going to be working with the dev team to get a rigorous QA plan put together (which will be posted here) before we do any more major updates to the site.

Until then, enjoy the new functionality.

NCommander adds: I'm giving this a one time bump on the main index as it was posted very late for US based users. We *really really* need a featured story feature.
 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by jimshatt on Thursday April 10 2014, @08:49AM

    by jimshatt (978) on Thursday April 10 2014, @08:49AM (#29328) Journal
    Maybe you should be able to moderate but not in the subtrees below (and including) your own comments.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Interesting=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 2) by elf on Thursday April 10 2014, @12:48PM

    by elf (64) on Thursday April 10 2014, @12:48PM (#29414)

    I like this idea, I up vote this for a future release

  • (Score: 1) by urza9814 on Thursday April 10 2014, @02:17PM

    by urza9814 (3954) on Thursday April 10 2014, @02:17PM (#29442) Journal

    Yeah, this was discussed as one of the options in the original threads about moderate^post, and I *think* they may have said that there may be some future revisions along those lines (I'm not an admin or anything though so I could be way off there). Obviously that code would be much more complicated.

    Really, you need to lock the entire thread not just below but also all the way to the top if you're going to do moderate AND post. Obviously you don't want people up-voting their own posts...and you don't want them up-voting replies either, because that still raises the visibility of their own post. But even up-voting the posts they replied to could do the same. Want easy karma? Reply to a troll then up-mod the troll. Some mods may vote the troll back down, but others may see your reply and prefer to up-vote that instead. Only way to prevent people from trying to abuse moderation to guide others to their own posts is to lock them from moderating the entire thread from the top once they post.

    I recall NCommander (I think) saying that the database layout currently makes it rather difficult to find the top of the thread from a specific post, so that would take some significant redesign.

    • (Score: 2) by NCommander on Thursday April 10 2014, @04:39PM

      by NCommander (2) Subscriber Badge <michael@casadevall.pro> on Thursday April 10 2014, @04:39PM (#29540) Homepage Journal

      The problem is there's no internal concept of a thread. Instead every post has a parent ID, and when threads are pulled, several loops are executed to assemble the threaded view. Thats fine for just discussions, but to work out if a post is in a thread, you need to walk the entire tree. The easy solution is just to generate a thread id, top-level posts create one automatically, and then the thread ID is inherited for each post going down the line.

      --
      Still always moving
    • (Score: 1) by FakeBeldin on Thursday April 10 2014, @06:47PM

      by FakeBeldin (3360) on Thursday April 10 2014, @06:47PM (#29636) Journal

      "Obviously you don't want people up-voting their own posts...and you don't want them up-voting replies either"
      Alternatively, we could just try to act grown up.

      I realise there are (very) good reasons for why the original code handles this the way it does. The likely direct reason: something went wrong, and this version of the moderation system mitigates the problem. Back then. For another site.

      I'm not saying we should ignore the past, but when I moved to this site (and stopped lurking, but registered), it was not because I expected all the self-aggrandising trolls of the Internet to congregate here. As far as I am concerned, you are all a bunch of excellent people that I don't mind entrusting with modpoints. Of course, if there were a more lenient mod system, we'd likely eventually discover some disadvantage of that one, and come up with our own solution for that. But it'll probably be different, and we'll collectively understand it to be superior to the old code ;-)

      • (Score: 1) by urza9814 on Thursday April 10 2014, @07:37PM

        by urza9814 (3954) on Thursday April 10 2014, @07:37PM (#29665) Journal

        Of course, if there were a more lenient mod system, we'd likely eventually discover some disadvantage of that one, and come up with our own solution for that. But it'll probably be different, and we'll collectively understand it to be superior to the old code ;-)

        I'd say that's exactly what's going on, we're just further into that process than you think.

        My interpretation of the situation has been that:
        We're starting with an existing code base. And much of the community here seems to agree that the existing system doesn't work for this site -- that there aren't enough users and that it was hindering our ability to contribute as much as we'd like. So the question is how to improve that system without throwing away the things that it *does* get right. I also think a lot of people (myself included) feel that the moderation system is one of the key things that made Slashdot what it was, and we're therefore reluctant to make any massive changes to that, or to throw it away entirely.