Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Friday May 06 2016, @10:29AM   Printer-friendly
from the never-underestimate-the-bandwidth... dept.

There is a story at ACM (Association for Computing Machinery) Queue concerning what is the best practice on getting data from here to there: Should You Upload or Ship Big Data to the Cloud? -- The accepted wisdom does not always hold true.

There is an old adage to never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of magnetic tapes going down the highway. The challenge is knowing when it is better (cheaper/faster) to ship it vs send it. This analysis will help you to decide.

This article investigates the tradeoffs between speed of communications between your systems and the cloud provider, how fast you can store your data to removable media/drives, and shipping delays so as to help you decide the fastest way to get your data from your systems to a cloud storage provider.

I found the article to be generally in-depth and well done but I do have a couple of caveats.

First, I saw no analysis of the impact on having faster shipping/turnaround on the tradeoffs. The assumption is that it would take 48 hours for shipping and handling for physical media. I would have liked to see what impact it would have on the analysis if that were, say, 24 hours instead.

Also, an assumption is made that the cloud provider would need to copy from your media to put it on their systems. A variation I did not see explored was to have media that could be directly mounted at the cloud provider — whether the media was supplied in advance by the provider or met certain provider-required specs. In either case, that would avoid the need for another copying pass of the data. That, in turn might greatly change the analysis of whether it would be faster to ship media or just upload it over the internet.

Those quibbles aside, it is one of they better articles I've seen that investigates that actual tradeoffs.


Ed Note: Obligatory xkcd and another

Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by butthurt on Saturday May 07 2016, @09:45PM

    by butthurt (6141) on Saturday May 07 2016, @09:45PM (#343013) Journal

    correction:

    On isitdownrightnow.com [isitdownrightnow.com] there are comments about Onedrive (formerly Skydrive) outages as recent as this January.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by frojack on Sunday May 08 2016, @01:42AM

    by frojack (1554) on Sunday May 08 2016, @01:42AM (#343065) Journal

    Outages are not data losses.

    Let's not let the goal posts start creeping away here.

    --
    No, you are mistaken. I've always had this sig.
    • (Score: 2) by butthurt on Sunday May 08 2016, @02:02AM

      by butthurt (6141) on Sunday May 08 2016, @02:02AM (#343068) Journal

      > Outages are not data losses.

      I've pointed out that, for someone relying on a cloud for backups, the service's unavailability can lead to loss of data, if the outage occurred at an inopportune time.

      > Let's not let the goal posts start creeping away here.

      You had written that "they don't have data loss" and provided three examples where Amazon and Microsoft did lose data. Perhaps you stand by your original statement? Cheers then.