Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Who or what should replace the CowboyNeal option in polls? | Log In/Create an Account | Top | 110 comments | Search Discussion
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

  • (Score: 2, Informative) by rcamera on Friday February 21 2014, @05:30PM

    by rcamera (2360) on Friday February 21 2014, @05:30PM (#4430) Homepage Journal
    the wikipedia tells us [wikipedia.org]

    How to prove libel; There are several ways a person must go about proving that libel has taken place. For example, in the United States, the person must prove that the statement was false, caused harm, and was made without adequate research into the truthfulness of the statement. These steps are for an ordinary citizen. For a celebrity or a public official, the person must prove the first three steps and that the statement was made with the intent to do harm or with reckless disregard for the truth, which is usually specifically referred to as "proving malice".

    1. first off, how is listing "dice.com" even considered a negative statement?
    2. good luck proving that harm was caused
    3. even if negativity and harm were "proven", how would one go about proving the option "dice.com" in a poll to be "a false statement"?
    4. there are many, many, many defenses [wikipedia.org] for defamation/libel. one of these is "opinion"... what is a poll if not "opinion"?
    --
    /* no comment */
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Informative=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  
    Total Score:   2