Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Cactus on Thursday February 20 2014, @03:00AM   Printer-friendly
from the least-untruthful-answer dept.

r00t writes:

"In September of 2013, Director of National Intelligence James R. Clapper stated that there were many 'important reasons' for the overly broad scope of the NSA's information collection programs. Among the reasons listed was that 'it could provide the United States and our allies early warning of international financial crises which could negatively impact the global economy.' Also mentioned was the long standing argument that the 'collection of information ... saves lives.'

In the months since the NSA data collections have come to light, many people question [pdf] the efficacy of the programs.

Now, in an exclusive interview, with The Beast, Clapper says that the NSA should have been more transparent about the secret programs. 'I probably shouldn't say this, but I will. Had we been transparent about this from the outset, we wouldn't have had the problem we had'. However, he still defends the practice by comparing it to 'fire insurance.'"

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Insightful) by dry on Thursday February 20 2014, @04:54AM

    by dry (223) on Thursday February 20 2014, @04:54AM (#3181) Journal

    use gathered information against what they term 'radicals'.

    To me this is the scariest part of the spying. My government has shown a habit to consider any opposition to itself to consist of "radicals" and considers dealing with them worth bending and breaking the law as they consider their policies to be necessary for the country. Breaking the law includes letting the NSA establish listening posts and trading information with other countries such as the USA.
    This gives the government "insurance" against opposition and "insurance" in targeting groups to politically neutralize through various means from making voting harder to having agents provocateur to discredit them.
    The other sad thing with the spying coming out is the damper on free speech. People have to watch out for electronically communicating anything that our governments considers radical lest they be targeted. And with the trading of information stopping domestic spying isn't enough, spying needs to be severely curtailed amongst allied countries.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +4  
       Insightful=3, Underrated=1, Total=4
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   5