Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Tuesday February 21 2017, @12:48PM   Printer-friendly
from the not-ignoring-ignorance dept.

From the I've-heard-enough-and-won't-take-it-anymore department, http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-39024648

The BBC reports that former Congressman Rush Holt, now part of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), is the spokesman for a movement "standing up for science".

His remarks reflect growing concern among researchers that science is disregarded by President Trump.

Scientists across the US plan to march in DC on 22 April.

[...] "To see young scientists, older scientists, the general public speaking up for the idea of science. We are going to work with our members and affiliated organisations to see that this march for science is a success."

Mr Holt made his comments at the AAAS annual meting in Boston as President Trump appointed a fierce critic of the Environmental Protection Agency as its head. Scott Pruitt has spent years fighting the role and reach of the EPA.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by jmorris on Wednesday February 22 2017, @03:43AM

    by jmorris (4844) on Wednesday February 22 2017, @03:43AM (#469981)

    Hmm, just a guess here but would your unnamed blogger be the one Moldbug^WBoldmug decloaked in the comments section of to administer a spanking to a few weeks (post is unclear as to exact date of first post but probably Jan 25) ago?

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by VLM on Wednesday February 22 2017, @03:15PM

    by VLM (445) on Wednesday February 22 2017, @03:15PM (#470210)

    We travel in the same circles, as you know. Probably lots of names we both know.

    I didn't want to derail by turning the prof's relatively typical behavior into a referendum on that prof individually. That's an inevitable sophistry technique, that just doesn't matter to the larger debate.