Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 14 submissions in the queue.
posted by on Saturday May 27 2017, @12:47PM   Printer-friendly
from the WannaCryToo dept.

An Anonymous Coward writes:

Hackernews reports:

A 7-year-old critical remote code execution vulnerability has been discovered in Samba networking software that could allow a remote attacker to take control of an affected Linux and Unix machines.

[...] The newly discovered remote code execution vulnerability (CVE-2017-7494) affects all versions newer than Samba 3.5.0 that was released on March 1, 2010.

"All versions of Samba from 3.5.0 onwards are vulnerable to a remote code execution vulnerability, allowing a malicious client to upload a shared library to a writable share, and then cause the server to load and execute it," Samba wrote in an advisory published Wednesday.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by kaszz on Saturday May 27 2017, @06:16PM (2 children)

    by kaszz (4211) on Saturday May 27 2017, @06:16PM (#516491) Journal

    Local LAN = within same netmask and behind any NAT or firewall. Presumably within the same building.
    Plain filesharing = Open share, write file, read file, close share.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by wonkey_monkey on Saturday May 27 2017, @08:23PM (1 child)

    by wonkey_monkey (279) on Saturday May 27 2017, @08:23PM (#516524) Homepage

    Local LAN =...

    Local Local Area Network.

    I think the "Local Local" bit may be what exception was taken to.

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday May 27 2017, @09:40PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Saturday May 27 2017, @09:40PM (#516532)

      It could be LAN network inside VPN network that goes over WAN network.

      >;P