Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by FatPhil on Tuesday August 08 2017, @03:41AM   Printer-friendly
from the vote-for-the-motion,-or-roko's-basilisk-will-run-you-over dept.

United States House Republicans expect to introduce bills later this week that would bar states from setting their own rules for self-driving cars and take other steps to remove obstacles to putting such vehicles on the road, a spokeswoman said.

The legislative action comes as major automakers are joining forces with auto suppliers and other groups to prod Congress into action.

Last month, a US House of Representatives Energy and Commerce subcommittee held a hearing on a Republican draft package of 14 bills that would allow US regulators to exempt up to 100,000 vehicles a year per manufacturer from federal motor vehicle safety rules that prevent the sale of self-driving vehicles without human controls.

[...] GM, Alphabet Inc., Tesla Inc., and others have been lobbying Congress to pre-empt rules under consideration in California and other states that could limit self-driving vehicle deployment.

As the number of self-driving cars on the road grows, will drivers proceeding on manual game the self-driving algorithms and lead to a ban on non-self-driving cars?


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by terrab0t on Tuesday August 08 2017, @06:08AM (2 children)

    by terrab0t (4674) on Tuesday August 08 2017, @06:08AM (#550471)

    …rules that prevent the sale of self-driving vehicles without human controls.

    There should be permanent rules preventing the sale of self‐driving vehicles with human controls. Human controls imply the manufacturers are providing self‐driving functionality but expecting a human sitting at the controls to remain attentive and handle any problems. That’s an accident waiting to happen.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday August 08 2017, @01:33PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday August 08 2017, @01:33PM (#550576)

    > expecting a human sitting at the controls to remain attentive and handle any problems.

    Nope, this isn't what seems to be happening for cars that are lower than SAE Level 5 (full autonomy). Instead, the car "decides" in advance whether it can make the trip or not, at the time of route selection. If not, the driver/person has to drive and the self-driving system is inactive (but other driver aids like blind-spot detection and smart cruise control will still work.)

    Speculation -- you could break the trip up into segments and the self-driving feature may be able to handle most of them--but it will stop and have you take over for the hard bits.

  • (Score: 2) by frojack on Tuesday August 08 2017, @07:20PM

    by frojack (1554) on Tuesday August 08 2017, @07:20PM (#550722) Journal

    Human controls imply

    No that's simply not true. It simply provides for operating the vehicle in places where computerized driving is either not practical or simply not possible.

    --
    No, you are mistaken. I've always had this sig.