Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 11 submissions in the queue.
posted by mattie_p on Saturday February 22 2014, @09:04AM   Printer-friendly
from the so-it-runs-linux? dept.

girlwhowaspluggedout writes:

"Spike Aerospace has revealed how the Spike S-512, which is planned to be the first supersonic business jet, will be able to fly from New York to London in half the time that the flight requires now. The plane, which is expected to carry 12-18 passengers, will enjoy the reduced drag and lower weight that come with an advanced engine and no windows:" Read more below.

The new supersonic jet will feature a revolutionary windowless passenger cabin so no more glaring sun and no more shades to pull down or push up. Instead, the interior walls will be covered with a thin display screens embedded into the wall. Cameras surrounding the entire aircraft will construct breathtaking panoramic views displayed on the cabin screens. Passengers will be able to dim the screens to catch some sleep or change it to one of the many scenic images stored in the system.

Without windows, the S-512 is expected to reach speeds between Mach 1.6 and 1.8.

Dr Darren Ansell, an expert in space and aerospace engineering at the University of Central Lancashire, told BBC News what passengers in a plane without windows can expect to experience:

There will be no natural light it will all be simulated so it will be a bit like being in a tube. And how would it work from a safety perspective? If there was an accident how would you know which way the plane was facing, and where you had landed, when the cameras have failed?"

You just know that some imaginative hacker is going to have a field day with this..."

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Angry Jesus on Sunday February 23 2014, @12:37AM

    by Angry Jesus (182) on Sunday February 23 2014, @12:37AM (#5023)

    That's only a problem when you are very near the ground. Most of the time you are too far away from any reference point for there to a be visible correlation to movement. Any sudden drops that are discernible mid flight will be so serious that the last thing the passengers will be worrying about is whether the video is in sync or not.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 1) by evilviper on Sunday February 23 2014, @03:03AM

    by evilviper (1760) on Sunday February 23 2014, @03:03AM (#5053) Homepage Journal

    Have you ever heard of "clouds"?

    And I disagree with the assumption that people shut off their brains when there's turbulence/air pockets/wind shear/etc.

    --
    Hydrogen cyanide is a delicious and necessary part of the human diet.
    • (Score: 2) by Angry Jesus on Sunday February 23 2014, @05:30AM

      by Angry Jesus (182) on Sunday February 23 2014, @05:30AM (#5088)

      Have you ever heard of "clouds"?

      Have you ever flown in a plane?

      • (Score: 2) by evilviper on Sunday February 23 2014, @05:49AM

        by evilviper (1760) on Sunday February 23 2014, @05:49AM (#5090) Homepage Journal

        All the time.

        --
        Hydrogen cyanide is a delicious and necessary part of the human diet.
        • (Score: 2) by Angry Jesus on Sunday February 23 2014, @01:27PM

          by Angry Jesus (182) on Sunday February 23 2014, @01:27PM (#5174)

          Then clearly you've never paid attention to the clouds because anyone who has paid attention knows that clouds only look like they have a perceptible edge when you are too far away for a couple hundred foot change in altitude to be noticeable. And in the rare case of suddenly dropping more the a couple of hundred feet, nobody gives a shit what is outside the window.

          • (Score: 2) by evilviper on Monday February 24 2014, @12:00AM

            by evilviper (1760) on Monday February 24 2014, @12:00AM (#5383) Homepage Journal

            clouds only look like they have a perceptible edge

            They don't have sharp edges, but they do have areas of differing density. You absolutely can clearly see horizontal and some vertical columns of thinner and denser "fog" (for lack of better terms) while flying through clouds.

            And in the rare case of suddenly dropping more the a couple of hundred feet, nobody gives a shit what is outside the window.

            I still don't buy that, and you've certainly provided no evidence to support the claim. People may be scared, but that doesn't mean their brain shuts-off to everything they're seeing. In fact looking out the "window" is precisely what people would be doing, once they've got a good grip on the arm-wrests.

            --
            Hydrogen cyanide is a delicious and necessary part of the human diet.
            • (Score: 2) by Angry Jesus on Monday February 24 2014, @02:58AM

              by Angry Jesus (182) on Monday February 24 2014, @02:58AM (#5474)

              You absolutely can clearly see horizontal and some vertical columns of thinner and denser "fog" (for lack of better terms) while flying through clouds.

              So what? If you are inside the cloud you don't have any reference to figure out the scale of those areas.

              I still don't buy that, and you've certainly provided no evidence to support the claim. People may be scared, but that doesn't mean their brain shuts-off to everything they're seeing

              Maybe the reason you don't "buy that" is because I didn't say "their brain shuts-off" -- I said they don't care. If the the video doesn't sync up and the illusion is lost it doesn't fucking matter.

              • (Score: 1, Troll) by evilviper on Monday February 24 2014, @03:47AM

                by evilviper (1760) on Monday February 24 2014, @03:47AM (#5503) Homepage Journal

                If you are inside the cloud you don't have any reference to figure out the scale of those areas.

                So when the jet banks and rolls 45 degrees, and starts climbing/diving you won't notice that the picture out the window is following right along with you? Uhhh...

                If the the video doesn't sync up and the illusion is lost it doesn't fucking matter.

                Well, if Angry_Jesus says it doesn't matter, than I'm sure nobody else in the world will care...

                Why not just put a matte painting up there, instead, and save tons of money and power consumption on those LCD displays?

                --
                Hydrogen cyanide is a delicious and necessary part of the human diet.
                • (Score: 2) by Angry Jesus on Monday February 24 2014, @03:14PM

                  by Angry Jesus (182) on Monday February 24 2014, @03:14PM (#5858)

                  Lol, good thing Foobar Bazbot was there to do your thinking for you.

                  • (Score: 0, Flamebait) by evilviper on Monday February 24 2014, @11:34PM

                    by evilviper (1760) on Monday February 24 2014, @11:34PM (#6279) Homepage Journal

                    A shame you can't do any...

                    --
                    Hydrogen cyanide is a delicious and necessary part of the human diet.
  • (Score: 1) by Foobar Bazbot on Sunday February 23 2014, @04:32PM

    by Foobar Bazbot (37) on Sunday February 23 2014, @04:32PM (#5208) Journal

    The problem isn't position changes (as you say, reference points are too far away for those to matter), but attitude changes. When the plane starts to roll, any visual lag will be very perceptible, because the entire view should exhibit the same roll rate, regardless of distance.