Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by takyon on Monday April 30 2018, @02:16AM   Printer-friendly
from the escape-from-the-return-to-the-moon dept.

The Washington Post reports that NASA "has canceled its only lunar rover currently in development," Resource Prospector. From Wikipedia:

Resource Prospector is a cancelled mission concept by NASA of a rover that would have performed a survey expedition on a polar region of the Moon. The rover was to attempt to detect and map the location of volatiles such as hydrogen, oxygen and lunar water which could foster more affordable and sustainable human exploration to the Moon, Mars, and other Solar System bodies.

The mission concept was still in its pre-formulation stage, when it was scrapped in April 2018. The Resource Prospector mission was proposed to be launched in 2022.

takyon: Meanwhile, NASA is "pushing hard on deep space exploration" with the Moon as its goal.

Also at Space.com, The Verge, and Fortune.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by takyon on Monday April 30 2018, @05:11AM (2 children)

    by takyon (881) <reversethis-{gro ... s} {ta} {noykat}> on Monday April 30 2018, @05:11AM (#673602) Journal

    Russia is more or less as hostile as China on a number of different fronts, but we still cooperate with them in space. Despite bad relations in recent years and an imminent displacement of Russia's manned launch capability, they are a Lunar Orbital Platform-Gateway partner.

    I guess the big difference is that Russian know-how helped make the ISS and get astronauts there after the Space Shuttle program ended, whereas China is in "steal copy copy copy" mode, and Russia is a battered, neutered superpower while China is a rising superpower.

    I doubt the exclusion policy will last more than another ten years or so. Xi Jinping will probably meet with President Trump or a successor and someone will propose a space collaboration, and then the President will ask Congress to end or relax the policy.

    In the longer term, China's political system will have to survive growing internal pressure from citizens and the installation of a probable leader-for-life [nytimes.com]. If it doesn't, then the resulting country will probably become weaker, less antagonistic, and the exclusion policy will become obsolete.

    --
    [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 4, Insightful) by c0lo on Monday April 30 2018, @06:01AM

    by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Monday April 30 2018, @06:01AM (#673612) Journal

    ... whereas China is in "steal copy copy copy" mode,

    So were the Japanese back in the '70-ies. As a single example: they still manufacture better cars than Americans and their auto industry isn't quite in the collapse.

    ... and Russia is a battered, neutered superpower

    Neither US is a fresh chicken. If you look on the number of sciency stories on SN, you'll see that, more often than not, new discoveries are authored by European and Chinese authors (and increasingly less US). My point: in regards with scientific and technology progress, the "superpower" status doesn't seem to do shit for nowadays USA.

    The explanation may be quite simple: while the Europeans and Chinese have state sponsored science, the Sillicon Valey tends to hunt unicorns (and, lately, crypto-currency), while the US national debt has doubled in about 10 years to over 100% of GDP [usgovernmentdebt.us]. Those Trump tax-cuts? They are going to add to this debt.

    In the longer term, China's political system will have to survive growing internal pressure from citizens and the installation of a probable leader-for-life [nytimes.com].

    I'll be dead when China's political system will give way to "internal pressure from citizens".
    Deng Xiaoping was quite a reformist (and it is him that China can thank for the economic reforms [wikipedia.org] and implicitly the status of "raising power" that China now has). Even him could not stop the Tiananmen Square [wikipedia.org] and even a public massacre could not change the China's political system.
    I reckon that China is going to remain like it is for a long time: a country that doesn't quite react as the mind of a Westerner may think it should.

    --
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
  • (Score: 2, Redundant) by realDonaldTrump on Monday April 30 2018, @06:11AM

    by realDonaldTrump (6614) on Monday April 30 2018, @06:11AM (#673613) Homepage Journal

    President Xi is a great gentleman, he treated me tremendously well when I visited China. He's the most powerful President they've had in 100 years. He's President for life and I think it’s great. When you change Presidents a lot, you get bad Presidents. Like Bush Jr. and Obama. The global warming we should be worried about is the global warming caused by NUCLEAR WEAPONS in the hands of crazy or incompetent leaders!