Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Dopefish on Monday February 24 2014, @06:00AM   Printer-friendly
from the i-for-one-welcome-our-new-computer-overlords dept.

kef writes:

"By 2029, computers will be able to understand our language, learn from experience and outsmart even the most intelligent humans, according to Google's director of engineering Ray Kurzweil.

Kurzweil says:

Computers are on the threshold of reading and understanding the semantic content of a language, but not quite at human levels. But since they can read a million times more material than humans they can make up for that with quantity. So IBM's Watson is a pretty weak reader on each page, but it read the 200m pages of Wikipedia. And basically what I'm doing at Google is to try to go beyond what Watson could do. To do it at Google scale. Which is to say to have the computer read tens of billions of pages. Watson doesn't understand the implications of what it's reading. It's doing a sort of pattern matching. It doesn't understand that if John sold his red Volvo to Mary that involves a transaction or possession and ownership being transferred. It doesn't understand that kind of information and so we are going to actually encode that, really try to teach it to understand the meaning of what these documents are saying.

Skynet anyone?"

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Funny) by TGV on Monday February 24 2014, @11:16AM

    by TGV (2838) on Monday February 24 2014, @11:16AM (#5740)

    An intelligent 5 year old "software human"

    10 PRINT "Why?"
    20 GOTO 10

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +4  
       Interesting=1, Funny=3, Total=4
    Extra 'Funny' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   5  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday February 24 2014, @01:07PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday February 24 2014, @01:07PM (#5769)

    You forgot a line:

    15 INPUT A$: REM answer waited for, but then ignored

    • (Score: 1) by githaron on Monday February 24 2014, @03:26PM

      by githaron (581) on Monday February 24 2014, @03:26PM (#5873)

      He was trying to increase the functional efficiency of the algorithm.