Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 19 submissions in the queue.
posted by janrinok on Thursday June 26 2014, @04:55PM   Printer-friendly
from the matter-of-interpretation dept.

The death of software patents in the United States has been greatly exaggerated. In a memo to Patent Examiners, the United States Patent And Trademark Office (USPTO) has released preliminary examination guidelines in view of the U.S. Supreme Court's recent opinion in Alice v. CLS Bank. The guidelines, which have been provided in a post on the patent blog Patently-O [PDF], specify that:

Alice Corp. neither creates a per se excluded category of subject matter, such as software or business methods, nor imposes any special requirements for eligibility of software or business methods.

The memo notes that "the basic inquiries to determine subject matter eligibility remain the same" and guide Examiners that they must "first determine whether the claim is directed to one of the four statutory categories of invention, i.e., process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter. If the claim does not fall within one of the categories, reject the claim as being directed to non-statutory subject matter". Then, "if the claim does fall within one of the statutory categories, determine whether the claim is directed to a judicial exception (i.e., law of nature, natural phenomenon, and abstract idea) using Part I of [a] two-part analysis... and, if so, determine whether the claim is a patent-eligible application of an exception using Part 2 [of the two-part analysis]".

More details of the proposed analysis are provided in the guidelines linked to above.

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1, Funny) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday June 26 2014, @07:41PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday June 26 2014, @07:41PM (#60524)

    I would copy from the PDF, but Adobe seems incapable.

    As a representative of Adobe I apologize but you see we would do it but there's this software patent...

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +1  
       Funny=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Funny' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   1