NY Times (primary source), Vox, Gizdomo and some others report over a resolution to encourage breast-feeding, which was expected to be approved quickly and easily by the hundreds of government delegates who gathered in Geneva for the United Nations-affiliated World Health Assembly.
Vox:
[...] American officials surprised international delegates at the United Nations-affiliated World Health Assembly in May when they opposed a widely popular resolution to promote breastfeeding, according to a Sunday report by Andrew Jacobs for the New York Times. Specifically, they pushed to remove language asking governments to "protect, promote, and support breast-feeding." They also took issue with a passage that called for policymakers to restrict the promotion of food products that may harm children.
It appears that the administration of President Donald Trump sided with corporate interests — the $70 billion infant formula industry — over the health and well-being of kids around the globe. The baby food industry is primarily based in the US and Europe.
The Americans were so ardent in their opposition that they made serious threats to Ecuadorian delegates, who were going to introduce the resolution. According to the Times, the Americans said if Ecuador didn't drop the proposal, "Washington would unleash punishing trade measures and withdraw crucial military aid."
The resolution ultimately made its way through, as a result of Russian intervention. "We feel that it is wrong when a big country tries to push around some very small countries, especially on an issue that is really important for the rest of the world," a Russian delegate told the Times. The US did not make the same threats to Russia as it had to Ecuador, and the resolution was passed mostly in its original form.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday July 10 2018, @05:40AM (2 children)
Where does that say something about this resoultion being introduced to stop african hospitals to scamming their patients due to being paid off by baby formula companies?
(Score: 3, Informative) by AthanasiusKircher on Tuesday July 10 2018, @05:54AM (1 child)
Try reading comprehension. The resolution was introduced by Ecuador, which (by the way) is not in Africa. I mentioned Africa because that's where the problem first appeared some 40 years ago (IIRC). It's an ongoing well-known problem in the developing world (the ongoing aspect is discussed in depth in my second link).
This is basically THE issue with formula promotion worldwide today. It's the main reason developing countries have been pushing for breast-feeding education for decades. Sorry if you've never heard of it before.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday July 10 2018, @12:51PM
Im guessing this is the resolution?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/infantfeeding/manual-ending-inappropriate-promotion-food/en/ [who.int]
It says formulas are fine if provided and branded by an "official" organization: