SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
Submitted via IRC for chromas
Trust but verify: Machine learning's magic masks hidden frailties
The idea sounded good in theory: Rather than giving away full-boat scholarships, colleges could optimize their use of scholarship money to attract students willing to pay most of the tuition costs.
So instead of offering a $20,000 scholarship to one needy student, they could divide the same amount into four scholarships of $5,000 each and dangle them in front to wealthier students who might otherwise choose a different school. Luring four paying students instead of one nonpayer would create $240,000 in additional tuition revenue over four years.
The widely used practice, called "financial aid leveraging," is a perfect application of machine learning, the form of predictive analytics that has taken the business world by storm. But it turned out that the long-term unintended consequence of this leveraging is an imbalance in the student population between economic classes, with wealthier applicants gaining admission at the expense of poorer but equally qualified peers.
[...] Financial aid leveraging is one of several examples of questionable machine-learning outcomes cited by Samir Passi of Princeton University and Solon Barocas of Cornell University in a recent paper about fairness in problem formulation. Misplaced assumptions, failure to agree on desired outcomes and unintentional biases introduced by incomplete training data are just some of the factors that can cause machine learning programs to go off the rails, yielding data that’s useless at best and misleading at worst.
"People often think that bad machine learning systems are equated with bad actors, but I think the more common problem is unintended, undesirable side effects," Passi said in an interview with SiliconANGLE.
[...] Like most branches of artificial intelligence, machine learning has acquired a kind of black-box mystique that can easily mask some of its inherent frailties. Despite the impressive advances computers have made in tasks like playing chess and piloting driverless automobiles, their algorithms are only as good as the people who built them and the data they're given.
The upshot: Work on machine learning in coming years is likely to focus on cracking open that black box and devising more robust methods to make sure those algorithms do what they’re supposed to do and avoid collateral damage.
Any organization that's getting started with machine learning should be aware of the technology's limitations as well as its power.
(Score: 2) by bobthecimmerian on Tuesday February 12 2019, @07:10PM
I'd argue that a good teacher - the kind you would actually want educating children - is almost certainly capable of becoming an electrician. And you can't export an electrician's job overseas, but if there are dozens nearby you won't pay that much anyway. As you said, like physicians they have effectively set up a guild system to protect their income ('guild' is my term for it, I don't know if you would call it that).
But to jump back to education, I think a stellar education should be a top priority for all children across the country, almost completely without regard to expense. However, I would not tie education or education plans to economic advantages. The Democratic Party promise that education opportunities will fix the shrinking middle class is a lie or at best a stupid mistake. It won't, other factors are driving wages downwards and the same supply and demand factors will prevent most of the people going into code/nursing/trades/etc... from jumping a few notches on the income ladder.