https://fossforce.com/2019/03/foss-on-the-road-to-nowhere/
The FSF and Linux Foundation are not the only organizations that could assume the moral leadership of FOSS. practices the same ideals that existed in FOSS twenty years ago. Similarly, after years of inactivity, the Open Source Initiative (OSI) has been struggling recently to again be relevant. However, both have a long way to ago before they can speak for the majority of FOSS, assuming they would care to.
Maybe the loss of a single direction is a sign of the success of FOSS. Maybe shared ideals can only exist at a certain point in a movement's development, and to wish otherwise is only meaningless nostalgia. Yet, despite the success of FOSS, today it has only partly transformed technology and business, and much remains to do. Unless we decide to content ourselves with what has already been done, I think that a sense of meaning — of making a difference — is more useful than seeing FOSS as nothing more than a shorter time to market.
(Score: 2) by Dr Spin on Sunday March 31 2019, @09:15PM
Cathedral software was build by a select group until it was complete and released, Bazaar was more about continous development
No software is ever complete. Quite a lot of it appears to escape, rather than be released.
The BSDs are cathedral in that there is quality control and release engineering, centrally controlled, for the entire product.
Linux distros are often just bizarre (have systemd - won't travel).
Warning: Opening your mouth may invalidate your brain!