Here's why NASA's audacious return to the Moon just might work
Speaking in front of a high-fidelity model of the Apollo program's Lunar Module spacecraft, Vice President Mike Pence charged NASA with accelerating its Moon plans last week. Instead of 2028, Pence wanted boots on the ground four years earlier, before the end of 2024. This marked the rarest of all moments in spaceflight—a schedule moving left instead of to the right.
Understandably, the aerospace community greeted the announcement with a healthy dose of skepticism. Many rocket builders, spaceship designers, flight controllers, and space buffs have seen this movie before. Both in 1989 and 2004, Republican administrations have announced ambitious Moon-then-Mars deep space plans only to see them die for lack of funding and White House backing.
And yet, this new proposal holds some promise. Pence, as well as NASA Administrator Jim Bridenstine, have adopted a clear goal for the agency and promised enduring political support. Moreover, they have said the "end" matters more than the "means." This suggests that whatever rockets and spacecraft NASA uses to reach the Moon, the plan should be based on the best-available, most cost-effective technology. In short, they want to foster a healthy, open competition in the US aerospace industry to help NASA and America reach its goals.
[...] Pence directed NASA to land humans at the lunar south pole by 2024. Most likely, this would be a two- or four-person crew that would include the first woman to visit the Moon. Landing near the poles is significant because the Apollo missions half a century ago stayed relatively close to the Moon's equator, and NASA would like to understand whether water ice resources truly exist in abundance near the poles in shadowed craters.
[...] It is politically expedient to keep the SLS rocket, however, because it is based at the Marshall Space Flight Center in Alabama. Bridenstine understands that there is no way he is getting NASA to the Moon by 2024 over the opposition of the Alabama delegation both in the House and Senate, which remains dead set against side-lining the rocket for cheaper commercial options.
So the administrator appears to be making the one play available to him: giving the SLS rocket a chance to succeed while also putting the program on notice. Bridenstine has told senior NASA engineers to take needed steps to give the rocket its best chance to launch in 2020, even to the point of waiving a traditional but time-consuming test firing of the core stage at a Mississippi center. He has also told the rocket's primary contractor, Boeing, that this is probably their last chance to execute on a contract that has cost NASA billions of dollars. In a year or two, if SLS continues to slip, Bridenstine will be able to say he tried.
Related: How to Get Back to the Moon in 4 Years, Permanently
President Trump Signs Space Policy Directive 1
After the Falcon Heavy Launch, Time to Defund the Space Launch System?
2020s to Become the Decade of Lunar Re-Exploration
White House Budget Request Would Move Launches from SLS to Commercial Providers
NASA Chief Says a Falcon Heavy Rocket Could Fly Humans to the Moon
(Score: 2, Interesting) by jmorris on Saturday April 06 2019, @03:20AM (8 children)
Before, these plans always involved a timetable that the President "boldy" announcing it knew he wouldn't be held accountable to because he would be gone. Assuming, as all the oddsmakers and historians, that Trump is reelected, Trump will be President in 2024 and we can assume launching Pence to the Republican nomination as his hand picked successor. The keeping, or failure to keep, this promise will directly be an issue for President Trump and a campaign issue Mr. Pence will have to either answer for or claim as an accomplishment.
Of course it also means a lot of people on the Left, who otherwise would be supporting the project, will be attempting to scuttle the attempt to score a marker. The #resistance is more important!
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday April 06 2019, @03:28AM (7 children)
> ..Trump will be President in 2024
Ok that's your prediction.
Mine is that Trump will be removed from office for mental incompetence (ranting/raving/incoherence/dementia), well before that date.
Prepared to put any money on this? (said the AC with a grin)
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday April 06 2019, @03:37AM
It's not hard to make anon bets using crypto. Or just use predictit.com.
(Score: 2) by DannyB on Saturday April 06 2019, @04:11PM (5 children)
That's your prediction.
Mine is that Trump will not leave office voluntarily during his 2nd, 3rd or 4th term.
The Centauri traded Earth jump gate technology in exchange for our superior hair mousse formulas.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday April 06 2019, @06:11PM
Which Trump? There are many Trumps slated for the presidency until 2046.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday April 06 2019, @08:20PM (2 children)
You mean like you predicted with JWB?
(Score: 1) by khallow on Saturday April 06 2019, @11:02PM (1 child)
(Score: 2) by DannyB on Monday April 08 2019, @01:36PM
I was going to ask JWB who? JWB doesn't ring any bells for me.
The Centauri traded Earth jump gate technology in exchange for our superior hair mousse formulas.
(Score: 1) by khallow on Saturday April 06 2019, @10:50PM
Sounds like a fine betting opportunity. How much are you willing to bet that Trump does that once? And what are the odds?