GungnirSniper writes "By a six to three vote, the US Supreme Court has ruled police may enter a home if one occupant allows it even after another previously did not consent.
In the decision on Tuesday in Fernandez v. California, the Court determined since the suspect, Walter Fernandez, was removed from the home and arrested, his live-in girlfriend's consent to search was enough. The Court had addressed a similar case in 2006 in Georgia v. Randolph, but found that since the suspect was still in the home and against the search, it should have kept authorities from entering.
RT.com notes "Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg joined in the minority by Justices Kagan and Sotomayor, marking a gender divide among the Justices in the case wrote the dissenting opinion, calling the decision a blow to the Fourth Amendment, which prohibits 'unreasonable searches and seizures.'"
Could this lead to police arresting people objecting to searches to remove the need for warrants?"
(Score: 0) by mendax on Saturday March 01 2014, @12:25AM
The fact that they heard screaming and sounds would have been sufficient probable cause to enter the residence in my opinion. The police had ample information to suspect that there was a crime being committed. That's all they need for a warrantless entrance. Once they're in, everything is fair game.
Absolutely. The police did not arrest the man just to get him out of the way so they could ask the remaining resident for permission to search.
But they could also have simply staked out the residence and waited for the man to run an errand and then asked the woman for permission to search. The law has been very clear on this point for a long time.
It's really quite a simple choice: Life, Death, or Los Angeles.
(Score: 2) by Angry Jesus on Saturday March 01 2014, @08:58AM
The fact that they heard screaming and sounds would have been sufficient probable cause to enter the residence in my opinion.
That is reasonable, up and to the point at which they hauled the guy off. At that point, the screaming that happened before doesn't give them probable cause anymore because presumably he caused the screaming and with him gone any threat he posed to her safety is also gone.