Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 17 submissions in the queue.
posted by LaminatorX on Friday August 22 2014, @06:52AM   Printer-friendly
from the Next-year-in-Jerusalem dept.

ZDNet reports that from supercomputers to stock markets to smartphones, Linux dominates most computing markets, but Linus Torvalds still wants Linux to rule on one place it doesn't: The desktop. "The challenge on the desktop is not a kernel problem. It's a whole infrastructure problem. I think we'll get there one day," said Torvalds at the LinuxCon Convention in Chicago. "Year of the Linux desktop?" asked Kroah-Hartman. "I'm not going there," replied Torvalds with a smile.

Torvalds also discussed the issue of kernel code bloat as Linux is now being run in small-form-factor embedded devices. "We've been bloating the kernel over the last 20 years, but hardware has grown faster," Torvalds said. Torvalds wants to push the envelope for the embedded market despite some challenges. He noted that some of the small-form-factor device vendors have their own operating system technologies in place already, and those vendors don't always make hardware readily available to Linux kernel developers.

The issue of Linux code maintainers was another hot-button topic addressed by Torvalds, who noted that some Linux kernel code has only a single maintainer and that can mean trouble when that maintainer wants to take time off. Torvalds said that a good setup that is now used by the x86 maintainers is to have multiple people maintaining the code. It's an approach that ARM Linux developers have recently embraced, as well. "When I used to do ARM merges, I wanted to shoot myself and take a few ARM developers with me," Torvalds said. "It's now much less painful and ARM developers are picking up the multiple maintainer approach."

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by cykros on Sunday August 24 2014, @08:01PM

    by cykros (989) on Sunday August 24 2014, @08:01PM (#85050)

    It's mostly not Linux power users that are losing freedom with these anti-features, because, well, we root our devices and then proceed to root them out (or, in the case of Chromebooks anyway, often just replace ChromeOS with another flavor of Linux). As for the users migrating from Windows...well, they're not really losing any freedom, and are at least usually gaining some. And the big key here is that they're pumping money that goes to developing things like hardware drivers. While that's less true with Android and Chrome, as they're generally running on devices that conventional Linux distributions just haven't put the legwork into supporting (this isn't a stab...it's a significant amount of legwork, especially when you're trying to use a touchscreen interface to handle applications that never were intended for use with a touchscreen), in the similar case of Valve with Steam (full of DRM, proprietary code, etc), it's still given hardware companies a reason to care about supporting Linux, especially when faced with competitors who already are on that path.

    End result? Even if you're not using these proprietary software solutions, you may still end up benefiting from the improvements to the GNU/Linux ecosystem that came in their wake.

    My much bigger gripe is actually with companies like Canonical, and moreso than that, the distributions that feel the need to do whatever Canonical is doing. For now, it's not a big deal, because I use Slackware, and really am not too worried that it'll follow the same trend (Our Supreme Dictator for Life has a tendency to be pretty stubborn about not fixing what isn't broken...especially when there are broken things left around to fix. We're still using LILO by default.). The de-unix-ification of Linux is the scariest part of its success to me, as even the long time established distributions (Debian goes back to 1993...) show themselves all to willing to make some serious head scratching decisions.

    I'm not against progress...but I am against a trend where every year you're facing a situation where your personal choice in distribution ends up changing enough that you no longer have any sense of familiarity, all for a matter of features you didn't need/want, and a new list of bugs and security holes to go with it. When progress stops being focused on achieving goals to solve real problems, it stops being progress, and turns into chaotic turbulence.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2