Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Wednesday January 22 2020, @03:28PM   Printer-friendly
from the 60%-likely-is-40%-unlikely dept.

MedicalXPress:

How similar do you think you are to your second cousin? Or your estranged great aunt?

Would you like to have people assess your behaviour from what your great aunt has done? How would you feel if courts used data gained from them to decide how you are likely to behave in the future?

Scientists are making connections between a person's DNA and their tendencies for certain kinds of behaviour. At the same time, commercial DNA databases are becoming more common and police are gaining access to them.

When these trends combine, genetic data inferred about offenders from their relatives might one day be used by courts to determine sentences. In the future, the data from your great aunt could be used by a court to determine how severely you are punished for a crime.

[...] A Florida judge recently approved a warrant to search a genetic genealogy , GED Match. This American company has approximately 1.3 million users who have uploaded their personal genetic data, with the assumption of privacy, in the hope of discovering their family tree.

The court directly overruled these users' request for privacy and now the company is obliged to hand over the data.

[...] This might be used by the prosecution to make the case for a longer sentence. In some jurisdictions and circumstances, the prosecution may have a means of obtaining a sample of DNA directly from the offender. But where this is not legally possible without the offender's consent, the inference from relatives might fill a gap in the prosecution's case about how dangerous the offender is.

Your ability to be granted bail may hinge on your genes.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by ikanreed on Wednesday January 22 2020, @07:19PM (3 children)

    by ikanreed (3164) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday January 22 2020, @07:19PM (#946963) Journal

    It speaks volumes that, when criticizing your lazy-ass racial theories, you assume I'm denying the correlation of IQ to life outcomes. There's the whole bird-watching argument to have about that, but at least it's predictive, unlike Murray's rambling bullshit.

    What it says to me is that you don't actually read criticism of your theories, but just have canned replies that you assume address all criticism. Equally brainless, but, as a huge win for internet argumentation, much more annoying.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 22 2020, @07:54PM (2 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 22 2020, @07:54PM (#946978)

    you assume I'm denying the correlation of IQ to life outcomes.

    Isn't that exactly what you're doing? Postulate mysterium all you like [twitter.com] but I'll withhold judgment until I see some hard data.

    It speaks volumes that, when criticizing your lazy-ass racial theories

    What racial theories? If we are not discussing observable traits then why do positive discrimination affirmative action SAT penalties correlate inversely with observed racial IQ scores? What "racial theories" did Harvard & UNC apply and why did California ban affirmative action in '96?

    you don't actually read criticism of your theories,

    My theories? I haven't presented any of my own theories.

    • (Score: 2) by ikanreed on Wednesday January 22 2020, @08:37PM (1 child)

      by ikanreed (3164) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday January 22 2020, @08:37PM (#947001) Journal

      Why should I?

      My own theories are irrelevant to Murray being a dumbass inventing racist just-so stories.

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 22 2020, @09:56PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 22 2020, @09:56PM (#947036)

        My own theories are irrelevant to Murray being a dumbass inventing racist just-so stories.

        Sowell performed the most eloquent dismissals. [claremontreviewofbooks.com] The problem is that the available data remains consistent which isn't something to be dismissed if we actually want to understand what's going on.