Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Wednesday February 12 2020, @05:28AM   Printer-friendly
from the Gives-new-meaning-to-World-Wide-Web dept.

OneWeb's first large batch of satellites launch on Arianespace Soyuz rocket

A Soyuz rocket launched 34 small broadband satellites for OneWeb Thursday from the Baikonur Cosmodrome in Kazakhstan, marking the beginning of a multi-launch campaign for the company.

[...] The launch expands OneWeb's constellation of low Earth orbiting satellites to 40, following a Soyuz launch last February that carried six satellites.

Adrian Steckel, OneWeb's chief executive, told SpaceNews the company has another batch of 34 satellites launching from Baikonur in March before the company plans to take a monthlong break to implement spacecraft software and hardware changes. After that pause, OneWeb plans to launch once in May and once in June before potentially shifting out of a monthly launch cadence, he said.

Steckel said OneWeb still plans to achieve global coverage by the end of 2021. The company is building its satellites in Florida through a joint venture with Airbus Defence and Space called OneWeb Satellites.

Counting Thursday's launch, OneWeb plans to conduct a total of 17 or 18 Soyuz launches and one Ariane 6 launch with Arianespace to orbit 588 satellites before the end of next year, Steckel said. After those launches, OneWeb will pause again before deciding a schedule for launching 60 spares, completing the 648-satellite first-generation constellation, he said.

See also:
Op-ed | SpaceX's adaptation to market changes
SpaceX Starlink is a step closer to beaming satellite internet to Australia

Previously:
OneWeb Joins the Satellite Internet Gold Rush this Week


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1)
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday February 12 2020, @10:44AM (3 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday February 12 2020, @10:44AM (#957158)

    So ... I wonder why they didn't use SpaceX for the launches? I can understand Ariane via Airbus Defence and Space but why Proton? Ariane doesn't want to give any money to SpaceX because spite or what?

    • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday February 12 2020, @12:13PM (2 children)

      by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday February 12 2020, @12:13PM (#957167)

      Proton is cheap (compared to other expendable rockets) and reliable. Ariane was probably too big, and Proton just right for the lanch? SpaceX (Starlink) is a direct competitor for the same market.
      I can't vouch for the C-suite , but you may safely assume that at least engineering put a lot of reasoning behind this multi-millon-dollar choice.

      • (Score: 2) by DannyB on Wednesday February 12 2020, @05:22PM

        by DannyB (5839) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday February 12 2020, @05:22PM (#957268) Journal

        Iridium used SpaceX to replace its entire constellation recently. Some would say that Starlink might be a direct competitor.

        --
        The most difficult part of the art of fencing is digging the holes and carrying the fence posts.
      • (Score: 2) by Freeman on Wednesday February 12 2020, @05:32PM

        by Freeman (732) on Wednesday February 12 2020, @05:32PM (#957277) Journal

        While I wouldn't expect SpaceX to do anything that would harm their rocket launch business. I wouldn't be super comfortable giving my direct competitor more fuel to burn me with.

        --
        Joshua 1:9 "Be strong and of a good courage; be not afraid, neither be thou dismayed: for the Lord thy God is with thee"
  • (Score: 2) by esperto123 on Wednesday February 12 2020, @11:05AM (1 child)

    by esperto123 (4303) on Wednesday February 12 2020, @11:05AM (#957161)

    Is there any info on their satellites, like capacity, coverage area, how big are the user terminal antennas?
    I've read on another site that they will not sell directly to consumers, instead will sell capacity to local ISPs that then will sell it to end users. On one hand it seems to be a safer bet because they can sign few big contracts and don't have to deal with dumb users who can point the antenna up, but on the other it will probably make it much more expensive and it seems that star link will run circles around them.

    • (Score: 2) by takyon on Wednesday February 12 2020, @05:39PM

      by takyon (881) <reversethis-{gro ... s} {ta} {noykat}> on Wednesday February 12 2020, @05:39PM (#957283) Journal

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OneWeb_satellite_constellation [wikipedia.org]

      I've read on another site that they will not sell directly to consumers, instead will sell capacity to local ISPs that then will sell it to end users. On one hand it seems to be a safer bet because they can sign few big contracts and don't have to deal with dumb users who can point the antenna up, but on the other it will probably make it much more expensive and it seems that star link will run circles around them.

      I've expected Starlink to do the exact same thing to attempt to insulate themselves from the dirty work of being an ISP.

      --
      [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
(1)