Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by n1 on Friday August 29 2014, @08:33PM   Printer-friendly
from the but-not-with-an-uzi dept.

The accidental death of an instructor at an Arizona shooting range, killed while teaching a 9-year-old girl to fire a fully automatic Uzi, has touched off a debate among those who enjoy and teach the use of firearms: What’s the proper way to teach children about guns? The key, is training says gun instructor Butch Jensen. A gun is a tool, and like any tool — be it a circular saw or a kitchen knife — requires proper instruction. “It was clear that she was a beginner, and you don’t start a beginner in that type of firearm,” says Jensen, who watched a widely circulated video of the fatal lesson. “If you want to learn how to run Indy cars, you don’t start at Indy.” Blake Carrington, who serves in the Air Force, has taught his 10-year-old daughter to shoot a .22 rifle. “I personally would never give my child a fully automatic weapon,” says Carrington. “I feel terrible for that little girl having to live with that.”

Shooting instructors said in interviews that in some cases, a 9-year-old may be able to handle an Uzi, even though it has a tricky recoil and can fire hundreds of rounds per minute. The child would have to weigh enough to handle the recoil and have some experience with guns. The parent and instructor would have to jointly determine that the child is mature and skilled enough to operate the firearm safely. Tom, who practiced with an M1 Garand Rifle, says he shoots for sport and to exercise his 2nd Amendment rights. “I don’t think you should keep kids away from firearms. This shouldn’t keep people from taking their kids to the range.” Still, Tom says he could not fathom why adults allowed the 9-year-old girl to shoot an Uzi. “I don’t know what they were thinking. My personal opinion is someone under 15 years of age playing with a submachine weapon is not a good idea.”

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by khallow on Sunday August 31 2014, @06:58AM

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Sunday August 31 2014, @06:58AM (#87770) Journal

    you're right, rights don't need exercising because they do not atrophy. the "use it or lose it" concept is stupid because it implies that if you aren't using something constantly then its not important, and it means that if you do stop using them all the time you're fine with them being taken away. fuck that nonsense. just because i put something down doesn't mean its ok for you to take it.

    You might not have noticed this, but people, groups, and governments routinely do things that aren't ok.

    rights do not have to be exercised all the time, but they do need to be defended any time somebody tries to take them away or undermine them.

    Ah, I see. They don't need to be "exercised" but they do need to be "defended". I consider that the same thing.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2