Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by LaminatorX on Tuesday September 02 2014, @03:02AM   Printer-friendly
from the al-gebra dept.

Joanna Paraszczuk reports that Iranian Grand Ayatollah Makarem Shirazi says high speed internet is unethical and contrary to humanitarian principles adding that 3G and broadband internet are morally wrong, and that there need to be standards to prevent users from dangers such as “immoral and inhumane” videos and photos, rumors, and espionage. “It should not be assumed by some people that we are against these technologies. But the Western technology is like muddy and unsanitary water. Water is the lifeblood, but when it gets murky and unsanitary it must be purified,” says the ayatollah. The Grand Ayatollah’s comments come after one of Iran’s largest mobile operators, Irancell, announced this month that it would test 3G services to universities and government offices, and after Iranian President Hassan Rouhani said earlier this year that Iran should upgrade its internet services.

Iranian President Rouhani insists the internet is crucial to connect with the world of science, saying: "We cannot close the gates of the world to our younger generation. If we do not move towards the new generation of mobile today and resist it, we will have to do it tomorrow. If not, the day after tomorrow." BBC Middle East analyst Sebastian Usher says President Rouhani's comments will resonate in Iran, but it is unclear if they will carry any real weight. Iran's government cracked down on media freedom and internet access after widespread protests against the country's leaders in 2009, banning online services like Facebook, Twitter and YouTube. Since then, many Iranians have grown used to bypassing censorship controls by using proxy servers or other online tools.

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by tangomargarine on Tuesday September 02 2014, @02:43PM

    by tangomargarine (667) on Tuesday September 02 2014, @02:43PM (#88512)

    I'm not a fan of the term either, but this seems to be a pretty clear case of it. Apparently it's not just limited to us pampered first-worlders.

    He'd rather have the whole Internet censored than just tell his fucking followers to exercise a bit of self-control and NOT VIEW THINGS THEY DON'T LIKE. Islam is all about self-control! It's right there in the name! "Submission" to the will of Allah.

    Obligatory xkcd [xkcd.com]

    --
    "Is that really true?" "I just spent the last hour telling you to think for yourself! Didn't you hear anything I said?"
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Interesting=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday September 02 2014, @04:03PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday September 02 2014, @04:03PM (#88543)

    > Islam is all about self-control! It's right there in the name! "Submission" to the will of Allah.

    While you are using the term incorrectly, your usage is pretty clearly god-control, not self-control.

    • (Score: 2) by tangomargarine on Wednesday September 03 2014, @02:34PM

      by tangomargarine (667) on Wednesday September 03 2014, @02:34PM (#88914)

      No, the adherent controls his desires and impulses in order to follow the precepts of the religion. Saying that Allah is personally reaching down and forcing everyone to follow along is a bit pretentious. A large part of the point of many religions is that it requires conscious and constant effort on the part of the believer to "walk the path."

      --
      "Is that really true?" "I just spent the last hour telling you to think for yourself! Didn't you hear anything I said?"