Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 18 submissions in the queue.
posted by Fnord666 on Friday May 01 2020, @11:04AM   Printer-friendly
from the resistance-is-futile.-/home-will-be-assimilated dept.

Good News:

Linux home directory management is about to undergo major change:

With systemd 245 comes systemd-homed. Along with that, Linux admins will have to change the way they manage users and users' home directories.

[...] Prior to systemd every system and resource was managed by its own tool, which was clumsy and inefficient. Now? Controlling and managing systems on Linux is incredibly easy.

But one of the creators, Leannart Poettering, has always considered systemd to be incomplete. With the upcoming release of systemd 245, Poettering will take his system one step closer to completion. That step is by way of homed.

[...] let's take a look at the /home directory. This is a crucial directory in the Linux filesystem hierarchy, as it contains all user data and configurations. For some admins, this directory is so important, it is often placed on a separate partition or drive than the operating system. By doing this, user data is safe, even if the operating system were to implode.

However, the way /home is handled within the operating system makes migrating the /home directory not nearly as easy as it should be. Why? With the current iteration of systemd, user information (such as ID, full name, home directory, and shell) is stored in /etc/passwd and the password associated with that user is stored in /etc/shadow. The /etc/passwd file can be viewed by anyone, whereas /etc/shadow can only be viewed by those with admin or sudo privileges.

[...] Poettering has decided to make a drastic change. That change is homed. With homed, all information will be placed in a cryptographically signed JSON record for each user. That record will contain all user information such as username, group membership, and password hashes.

Each user home directory will be linked as LUKS-encrypted containers, with the encryption directly coupled to user login. Once systemd-homed detects a user has logged in, the associated home directory is decrypted. Once that user logs out, the home directory is automatically encrypted.

[...] Of course, such a major change doesn't come without its share of caveats. In the case of systemd-homed, that caveat comes by way of SSH. If a systemd-homed home directory is encrypted until a user successfully logs in, how will users be able to log in to a remote machine with SSH?

The big problem with that is the .ssh directory (where SSH stores known_hosts and authorized_keys) would be inaccessible while the user's home directory is encrypted. Of course Poettering knows of this shortcoming. To date, all of the work done with systemd-homed has been with the standard authentication process. You can be sure that Poettering will come up with a solution that takes SSH into consideration.

Older articles:

Will systemd be considered complete once the kernel and boot loader have been absorbed into systemd?


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by sjames on Sunday May 03 2020, @06:39PM (2 children)

    by sjames (2882) on Sunday May 03 2020, @06:39PM (#989863) Journal

    On the other hand, I've found that VMs that used to just work every time now occasionally just decide to go into the emergency shell when they're rebooted. There's never actually anything wrong, just systemd deciding it didn't feel like it.

    Unfortunately, it's practically impossible to track down since there's literally hundreds of interlocking config files using broken COMEFROM logic and no understanding of the imperitive. No, upping the network interface is NOT optional on a remote server. No, mounting the specified file systems is not optional. Starting Apache on the web server wasn't a suggestion.

    If you actually want to have networking, it's best to kill NetworkManager dead.

    Now, in your scenario, what functionality was GAINED? That is, what can you do now that you couldn't do before?

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by The Mighty Buzzard on Monday May 04 2020, @12:28PM

    Cuss more skillfully.

    --
    My rights don't end where your fear begins.
  • (Score: 1) by DECbot on Monday May 04 2020, @08:19PM

    by DECbot (832) on Monday May 04 2020, @08:19PM (#990412) Journal

    Now, in your scenario, what functionality was GAINED? That is, what can you do now that you couldn't do before?

    You now have a legitimate reason for why you have no fucking clue what caused the VM to break. And now you can blame that on systemd and wait for RH to develop a fix--wait, not-a-bug.

    --
    cats~$ sudo chown -R us /home/base