Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Friday September 19 2014, @07:26PM   Printer-friendly
from the unless-they-were-'accidentally'-broken dept.

The Register has found itself subject to a certain amount of criticism for this author's skepticism ( Richard Chirgwin http://www.theregister.co.uk/Author/2242 ) regarding whether the NSA has been snooping on optical fibre cables by cutting them.

Glenn Greenwald's recent “NSA cut New Zealand's cables” story is illustrative of credibility problems that surround the ongoing Edward Snowden leak stories: everybody is too willing to accept that “if it's classified, it must be because it's true”, and along the way, attribute super-powers to spy agencies.

In running the line that undersea cables were cut, Greenwald is straying far enough from what's feasible and credible that his judgement on other claims needs to be questioned. It seems to The Register almost certain that neither Glenn Greenwald nor Edward Snowden have actually held a submarine fibre cable in their hands.

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/09/18/spies_arent_superheroes/

Do you think that it is credible that these undersea fibre cables were tapped when it is easier to tap onshore installations?

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday September 20 2014, @10:37AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday September 20 2014, @10:37AM (#95807)

    prolly need to be a bit cautious about mass copypasta from sources as it could potentially land SN in hot water for copyright infringement

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 22 2014, @01:59AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 22 2014, @01:59AM (#96542)

    unless "plagiarism" suddenly became "copyright infringement", then i think the term is mistaken.

    also, it shouldn't be plagiarism as long as the source is attributed.