Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 11 submissions in the queue.
posted by requerdanos on Monday December 28 2020, @06:21AM   Printer-friendly
from the love-your-enemy dept.

With an article that covers "From Cancer to Cloud" and beyond, Techrepublic asks: What is Microsoft Doing With Linux? Everything You Need to Know About its Plans for Open Source

'Microsoft and Linux' should be a phrase we're used to hearing by now. Microsoft is a member of not only the Linux Foundation but also the Linux kernel security mailing list... Microsoft is submitting patches to the Linux kernel... And when Microsoft wanted to add container support to Windows, it picked an open-source specification designed originally for [Linux].

Now Azure customers get the same hybrid benefits for Linux support contracts as they do for Windows Server licences; Windows runs Linux binaries; some key Microsoft applications are available on Linux; and new services might be built with Linux.

[...] At the recent Azure Open Day, Kubernetes co-founder and Microsoft corporate vice-president Brendan Burns talked about Microsoft having a deep understanding of Linux and contributing to existing open-source projects based on Linux as well as founding new ones like Dapr (Distributed Application Runtime).

[...] In short, Microsoft 'hearts' Linux.

But forget the idea of throwing away the Windows kernel and replacing it with a Linux kernel, because Microsoft's approach to Linux is far more pragmatic and comprehensive. Although the company is now thoroughly cross-platform, not every application will move to or take advantage of Linux. Instead, Microsoft adopts or supports Linux when the customers are there, or when it wants to take advantage of the ecosystem with open-source projects.

With GNU/Linux increasingly a part of both Windows 10 and Microsoft's cloud offerings, do you prefer to get your Linux from Microsoft, or from a more traditional source?


Original Submission

Microsoft Windows Linux for Everybody Windows 10 Will Soon Ship with a Full, Open Source, GPLed Linux Kernel Open Source's Eric Raymond: Windows 10 Will Soon be Just an Emulation Layer on Linux Kernel

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 28 2020, @03:40PM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 28 2020, @03:40PM (#1092050)

    >This is what I've never understood about RMS, and other left-leaning people supporting the GPL. It's like... the WORST UNION CONTRACT EVER.

    First, GPL have nothing to do with left wing, it is totally apolitical... some people love to do that association, but as true as saying that stealing is right wing thing!

    The idea of GPL is protecting the code and user. No where it says that developers must work for free and the true is that most open source developers in bigger projects today are paid for do that.
    Yes, in smaller projects, the developer usually work for free, but either it is solving it own problem or hope it will grow and upgrade to paid job... not that different from the right wing idea of a intern not being paid to gain experience. The difference between this and the traditional closed source development is that when a shareware software is abandon, it is lost but in open source, someone else can resume it. Add to that you can reuse other projects and use multiple building blocks, like a lego.

    This is what MS is doing, it taking the open blocks, add their own (also open blocks, due to the GPL, and using their own paid developers) and slam it inside a windows hidden VM. Sell that to some clueless companies as a excuse to not migrate to linux and get paid

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 28 2020, @05:44PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 28 2020, @05:44PM (#1092104)

    > ...apolitical...

    Ballmer wanted "to emphasise the competitive threat, and in some senses the competitive opportunity, that Linux represents. Linux is a tough competitor. There's no company called Linux, there's barely a Linux road map. Yet Linux sort of springs organically from the earth. And it had, you know, the characteristics of communism that people love so very, very much about it."

    https://www.theregister.com/2000/07/31/ms_ballmer_linux_is_communism/ [theregister.com]