Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Sunday March 14 2021, @05:15AM   Printer-friendly
from the ♫sowing-the-seeds-of-love♫ dept.

[Nearly 4 years ago, we covered flooding at the "doomsday" seed bank at the Svalbard Global Seed Vault. Fortunately, there was no harm to the seed samples stored there. For further background, consult the Wikipedia entry on the seed vault. --Ed]

Why We Need A ‘Moon Ark’ To Store Frozen Seeds, Sperm And Eggs From 6.7 Million Earth Species:

Species or planets[sic] could be wiped off the face of the Earth any minute—so we need a “Moon Ark” to safely store frozen eggs, sperm, seeds and other DNA matter from all 6.7 million Earth species.

That’s according to students and staff at the University of Arizona, who at the IEEE Aerospace Conference last weekend divulged details of an ambitious “modern global insurance policy” for our planet.

Their daring plan is to build a complex in the Moon’s lava tubes staffed by robots and fuelled by solar panels on the lunar surface.

[...] The incredible plan to build a lunar base that includes an underground ark goes something like this:

  • Ball-like SphereX robots—each weighing about 11lbs/5kg and able to fly and hop—to enter, explore and map the Moon’s recently discovered (in 2013) network of underground lava tubes, each about 328ft./100 meters in diameter.
  • Design, and then construct, underground ark in the lava tubes, with solar panels on the lunar surface and elevator shafts that access the facility.
  • Launch 250 rockets to the Moon, each taking 50 samples from each of 6.7 million species (it took about 40 to build the International Space Station).
  • Store the petri dishes of seeds in cryogenic preservation modules inside the lava tubes, which would shield the seeds from solar radiation, meteorites and temperature fluctuations.
  • The seeds would be kept at around -292ºF/180ºC, temperatures that would likely cold-weld together metal parts of the base. Cue “floating shelves” made from cryo-cooled superconductor materials that enable quantum levitation above a powerful magnet.
  • Staff the facility with robots that navigate through it above magnetic tracks. Robots that can operate under cryo-conditions don’t yet exist—though the proposers admit that new technologies will be needed to make the “Moon Ark” a reality.

Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by hemocyanin on Sunday March 14 2021, @08:32AM (13 children)

    by hemocyanin (186) on Sunday March 14 2021, @08:32AM (#1123951) Journal

    I think his point was that if things get so bad on earth that you need the seed/DNA archive, we've probably fallen way below the ability to launch rockets, build robots, land them, retrieve stuff, pack it up, and mail it back to earth.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday March 14 2021, @08:44AM (12 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday March 14 2021, @08:44AM (#1123952)

    If reaching a backup on the Moon is required to survive the new Dark Age, then yes you have a problem. If it's for restoring biodiversity, then it can be useful even if it takes 1000 years to return.

    • (Score: 2) by maxwell demon on Sunday March 14 2021, @09:35AM (11 children)

      by maxwell demon (1608) Subscriber Badge on Sunday March 14 2021, @09:35AM (#1123959) Journal

      The question is if we ever will be able to return to a technological age once we fall back behind it. Remember, the industrial revolution was kickstarted when we found large and easy-to access fossil resources of energy. We've used up all those easily accessed resources, and they will require millions of years to replenish. There will likely still exist some of the harder to access fossil resources, but to access those we already need to have sufficiently advanced technology.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday March 14 2021, @11:14AM

        by Anonymous Coward on Sunday March 14 2021, @11:14AM (#1123978)

        The strategy doesn't have to be perfect, just better than nothing at all. We need some humans on Mars too, and more technologies for off the grid living. Rich people should be building doomsday bunkers instead of buying NFTs.

        There will be billions of steel tools laying around, and other shortcuts to building back better.

      • (Score: 2) by legont on Sunday March 14 2021, @02:33PM (9 children)

        by legont (4179) on Sunday March 14 2021, @02:33PM (#1124011)

        I think that's exactly the point. Say all engineers are killed on earth. We can't restart until new easily accessible resources are brought up by geological processes which will take some millions years. Nevertheless, it will happen eventually, and perhaps we are still around to restart technology. At this point an archive might prove to be useful.

        --
        "Wealth is the relentless enemy of understanding" - John Kenneth Galbraith.
        • (Score: 1) by khallow on Sunday March 14 2021, @03:39PM (3 children)

          by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Sunday March 14 2021, @03:39PM (#1124037) Journal

          I think that's exactly the point. Say all engineers are killed on earth. We can't restart until new easily accessible resources are brought up by geological processes which will take some millions years.

          Or we can root through the trash and abandoned buildings. The easily accessible resources of the past are now much more easily accessible, often in the form we would need it manufactured as.

          • (Score: 2) by legont on Sunday March 14 2021, @04:02PM (2 children)

            by legont (4179) on Sunday March 14 2021, @04:02PM (#1124050)

            No, processing garbage on industrial scale is even bigger technological problem then getting resources from underground.

            --
            "Wealth is the relentless enemy of understanding" - John Kenneth Galbraith.
            • (Score: 1) by khallow on Monday March 15 2021, @03:00AM

              by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Monday March 15 2021, @03:00AM (#1124270) Journal

              No, processing garbage on industrial scale is even bigger technological problem then getting resources from underground.

              Sorry, no. First, it's at or near ground level. That alone takes considerably less effort than digging stuff from deep underground. Second, the resources are embedded in material that is far softer than the usual ore material. Third, the resources are usually higher quality and of higher concentration than in natural ore bodies.

            • (Score: 2) by Mykl on Monday March 15 2021, @04:27AM

              by Mykl (1112) on Monday March 15 2021, @04:27AM (#1124294)

              Who said anything about an industrial scale? I'm guessing that post-Apocalypse, our population will be down to a maximum of 5% of today's levels, probably more like under 1%. At those population levels (and due to a lack of other options), you'd probably find people just burning the garbage to get to the stuff they want

        • (Score: 2) by Immerman on Sunday March 14 2021, @04:35PM

          by Immerman (3985) on Sunday March 14 2021, @04:35PM (#1124070)

          Unfortuantely an archive is very unlikely to last that long. Even frozen seeds die eventually, and animal gamees aren't nearly so robust. Plus, all that equipment on the moon maintaining the atmospheric pressure and cryogenic temperatures won't last forever - once it breaks down the archived samples will die quite rapidly.

        • (Score: 3, Interesting) by rleigh on Sunday March 14 2021, @06:19PM (2 children)

          by rleigh (4887) on Sunday March 14 2021, @06:19PM (#1124116) Homepage

          The premise here and in the parent post is wrong.

          Our current fossil fuel resources were laid down in the Carboniferous period. That was a one-off event. It will never be repeated, at least on a global scale. Too many species have evolved to digest lignin, from bacteria to fungi. The lifetime of a fallen tree is just a few years, and if you chop it up into chips, just a few months, or weeks in hotter climates. It will be completely recycled before it can be preserved. The other factor is that during the Carboniferous period, animal and insect life as we know it had not evolved yet. There was nothing to disturb fallen trees. Today, there are hundreds of thousands of animal species crawling and rooting around. On a geological timescale, it's improbable that a tree could lain undisturbed even if it didn't get broken down by fungi or bacteria. The only way it could be fossilised is if it falls into a bog, and there aren't enough bogs around to make a difference. It would be geologically insignificant. The Carboniferous period can't be repeated again due to the vast amount of rapid evolution that followed it. Back then, entire temperate landmasses were filled with trees, and nothing else! Today, animal life shapes every aspect of the landscape we inhabit.

          • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday March 15 2021, @12:33AM (1 child)

            by Anonymous Coward on Monday March 15 2021, @12:33AM (#1124213)

            Today we are laying down a wonderful layer of plastics, which nothing has yet evolved to digest, so there is still a chance.

            • (Score: 2) by rleigh on Monday March 15 2021, @07:46AM

              by rleigh (4887) on Monday March 15 2021, @07:46AM (#1124344) Homepage

              This isn't entirely correct. We have already found bacterial and fungal species in rubbish tips on the surface of plastic bags and such with the capability of breaking down the pastic. They either evolved to do this, or they were already around in the environment and this is a niche they can thrive in. Probably the latter, perhaps with a few mutations on top to improve their ability to work with specific plastics.

              Life evolves to exploit energy sources. Just as it evolved to exploit the vast stored energy reserves of lignin, it will also evolve to digest various types of plastic. Right now, that process is very slow and inefficient, but it's inevitable that will improve over time. The main problem with plastic is its hydrophobicity which makes it more difficult for water-based enzymes to interact with, and some are worse than others. The process might be very slow on a human timescale. But on a geological timescale, I suspect most plastic will vanish relatively quickly.

        • (Score: 2) by c0lo on Sunday March 14 2021, @10:11PM

          by c0lo (156) on Sunday March 14 2021, @10:11PM (#1124171) Journal

          Say all engineers are killed on earth.

          Simple. Go to the Moon and get some engineers seeds.

          (large grin)

          --
          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0