Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Monday April 12 2021, @08:52AM   Printer-friendly
from the because-when-they-mess-up-they-only-have-a-golden-parachute...wait-a-minute dept.

Why are CEOs of U.S. firms paid 320 times as much as their workers?:

Last August, Jamelle Brown, a technician at Research Medical Center in Kansas City, Missouri, contracted Covid-19 while on the job sanitizing and sterilizing rooms in the facility's emergency department. Luckily, his case wasn't severe, and after having quarantined, he was back at work.

Upon his return, Brown was named Employee of the Month in his unit and given a gift voucher for use in the hospital cafeteria. The amount: $6.

"That stung me to the bone," said Brown, who makes $13.77 an hour and has worked for almost four years at the hospital, owned by the corporate giant HCA Healthcare. "It made me sit back and say, 'This place doesn't care for me.'"

Research Medical's owner, HCA Healthcare Inc., is a profitable, publicly traded network of 185 hospitals and 121 freestanding surgery centers in 20 states and England. Even in the year of Covid-19, 2020, the company generated $51.5 billion in revenue and increased its pretax earnings by 3.6 percent. Its shares are up by 14 percent this year, versus 10 percent on the Standard & Poor's 500 index.

That performance helped boost the total compensation HCA's chief executive, Samuel N. Hazen, received last year to $30.4 million, a 13 percent rise from 2019, documents show. Although Hazen's salary was 5.8 percent lower in 2020, the total worth of his compensation package equaled 556 times the compensation received by the median employee at HCA — $54,651.

The figures highlight the growing CEO pay gap, a problem among many public companies according to some investors and workers and even a few CEOs. In 2019, for example, the average pay ratio among 350 large American companies was 320-to-1, according to research by the Economic Policy Institute, a left-leaning think tank in Washington, D.C. In 1989, the average was 61-to-1.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2, Insightful) by khallow on Monday April 12 2021, @04:01PM (2 children)

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Monday April 12 2021, @04:01PM (#1136479) Journal

    Even if the think the compensation is too high, they won't vote against it because a potential disruption in the C-suite is even more costly to shareholders, at least in the short run and that's very much the mentality.

    In other words, a demonstration of the value of the CEO. OTOH, a large company that suddenly loses several hundred low level employees will not experience a similar disruption of their stock price.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Insightful=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday April 12 2021, @06:44PM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday April 12 2021, @06:44PM (#1136589)

    So then what does that tell you about the stock market?