Slash Boxes

SoylentNews is people

posted by LaminatorX on Wednesday March 05 2014, @06:30PM   Printer-friendly
from the It's-a-trap! dept.

dotdotdot writes:

"I am the IT guy for a small business with about 20 users. We use Microsoft Windows and Office, and I regularly audit our Microsoft volume license usage to make sure we are compliant.

I received an email from Accordo Group Ltd about a Microsoft Volume License Software Asset Management (SAM) License Review. The introduction letter stated, 'Microsoft would like to work with your company to review all Microsoft software products in use throughout your organization. This review process will be undertaken with all customers over a period of time and is intended to help you control your software assets.' The email and all the attachments were written as if they were from Microsoft, not Accordo. My first and last name, as well as the name of my company, were all misspelled.

So this is what I would like to ask SN:
Has anyone else had to deal with this? Are they just phishing for people who will agree to this?"

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Insightful) by edIII on Wednesday March 05 2014, @08:31PM

    by edIII (791) on Wednesday March 05 2014, @08:31PM (#11503)


    Responding to these letters is the same stupidity in freely talking to law enforcement.

    Unless it's from a local law firm informing you of Microsoft intending to enforce their licensing agreements with an audit, you ignore it. Microsoft, or their representatives (maybe-look at the agreement) are the only ones with legal standing.

    Even then, it's still a legal contract. You wait till they threaten to sue, and then you respond back with a friendly worded letter asking them to prove that Microsoft is their client, and the contacts over in Redmond that can verify such legal representation exists.

    After that stage, you tell them you want a legal document constructed in which you agree to the terms of the audit to protect you from unreasonable searches in desks, and the even more unreasonable searches in which they want their technician to have free access to systems with business data. They may come back and try to bully you and say you have no right, but it will cost them a crap load of money and time (the same) to go through the process.

    Once Microsoft hears about it (from you), and they can see that you have spent thousands with them already, they will drop it like it's poison.

    Asking Microsoft, or their representatives to indemnify you and hold you harmless from data breaches as a result of the audit is not unreasonable, especially given that states are progressively enacting heavy fines for such data loss that impacts citizens.

    If you just answer anybody and let them in the door because you're afraid, you deserve what may happen.

    Technically, lunchtime is at any moment. It's just a wave function.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +4  
       Insightful=2, Interesting=1, Underrated=1, Total=4
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   5