Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 17 submissions in the queue.
posted by janrinok on Thursday March 06 2014, @04:17PM   Printer-friendly
from the On-and-on-and-on dept.

kef writes:

"Lithium-sulphur batteries has been a promising technology for the last 40 years, but researchers could not get them to survive past about 100 cycles. Now a chemical engineer thinks he's found an answer. From the article:

'Chemical engineer Elton Cairns suspected he had tamed a promising-but-wild battery chemistry early last year, when his coin-sized cells were still going strong even after a few months of continual draining and recharging. By July, his cells at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory in Berkeley, California, had cycled 1,500 times and had lost only half of their capacity, a performance roughly on a par with the best Li-ion batteries. His batteries are based on Lithium-sulphur (Li-S) technology, which uses extremely cheap materials and in theory can pack in five times more energy by weight than Li-ion (in practice, researchers suspect, it will probably be only twice as much).'"

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 06 2014, @04:50PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 06 2014, @04:50PM (#12046)

    I wish I could find that chart that shows how far off certain advancements are based on the verbiage used to describe them. i.e. "theorized" advancements are 15 years away, "proposed" is 20, etc.

    I guess you are thinking of this. [xkcd.com]