Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 19 submissions in the queue.
posted by janrinok on Tuesday August 02 2022, @06:37AM   Printer-friendly

Arthur T Knackerbracket has processed the following story:

With the COVID spending spree on PCs at an end and consumers spooked by the economy, Intel's profit and revenue plunged in the second quarter, the chipmaker said Thursday. Intel's own problems, like delays in data center chip upgrades, also were a major factor.

Analysts were appalled. "Intel's Q2 takes the prize for the worst we have seen in our career," Bernstein analyst Stacy Rasgon said in a research note Friday.

[...] "For decades, Intel was able to cover up a litany of failed projects, poor acquisitions, and strategic foibles by pushing Moore's Law and process leadership," he said. "Unless they regain this leadership (we think unlikely), or change strategic direction, we expect growth, profitability, and cash flow problems to persist at Intel."

The results show how hard it will be for Intel to claw its way back to the cutting edge of chip manufacturing and lead the US semiconductor industry to reclaim clout lost to Asia. Intel's near-term problems pose real risks to its long-term plans.

[...] Revenue dropped 17% to $15.3 billion in the second quarter, and Intel's profit of 29 cents per share, excluding some charges like stock-based pay and inventory write-downs, was a 76% decrease compared with the same period a year earlier. Both results were well below Intel's own forecasts and analyst expectations. Including those charges, Intel posted a loss of $454 million.

[...] Intel's "long term targets remain outlandish," Rasgon said in a research note earlier this week, which downgraded his expectations for the chipmaker's prospects. "Frankly, anyone owning the stock is not there for the near term...but rather strapping into a 5+ year nebulous story that is just barely getting started."


Original Submission

 
This discussion was created by janrinok (52) for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday August 02 2022, @08:51AM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday August 02 2022, @08:51AM (#1264452)

    Not being able to trust the manufacturer of hardware one uses is.. awful.

    Last Intel CPU i bought, was in 2013.
    It is an okay CPU (an i3), but... it's hard to like anything, that has an unremovable enemy agent inside it.

    I look at the box its mounted in, and i don't see my property.
    I see property of American Federal Empire, that can be taken over by some spook with correct keys whenever.

    That is why, Dear Intel, you can keep your "secret" "debug" interfaces, encrypted firmware within encrypted firmware and all the many negative rings below ring0 for yourself.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +2  
       Troll=1, Insightful=1, Interesting=1, Informative=1, Total=4
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: -1, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday August 02 2022, @04:07PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday August 02 2022, @04:07PM (#1264561)

    Nobody cares that you exist, schizo.