Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 15 submissions in the queue.
posted by LaminatorX on Monday December 01 2014, @07:20AM   Printer-friendly
from the you-got-to-roll-me dept.

The price of oil is now under $70 a barrel after OPEC decided it would not cut back production significantly in the months ahead and the latest OPEC move suggests that it isn’t going to reverse course anytime soon.. Now Neil Irwin reports in the NYT that the falling price of oil looks likely to be one of the dominant forces shaping the global economy in 2015. So who wins and who loses? Winner: Global consumers as anybody who drives a car or flies on airplanes gets lower prices for gasoline and jet fuel. Loser: American oil producers - One of the big open questions is just how many of the small, independent producers in the American heartland will still be viable with oil prices in the $60s rather than the $100s. Many have relied on borrowed money, and bankruptcies are possible. Loser: Vladimir Putin - Russia’s economy is already facing its sharpest challenges in years, as Western sanctions imposed after Russian aggression toward Ukraine crimp the nation’s ability to be integrated in the global economy. Russia is a major energy producer, and the falling price of oil compounds the challenge facing its president, Vladimir Putin.

Potential Loser: The environment. As a general rule, the cheaper fossil fuels become, the more challenging it will be for cleaner forms of energy like solar and wind power to be competitive on price. But solar and wind power are sources for electricity, whereas fluctuations in oil prices most directly affect the price of transportation fuels like gasoline and jet fuel. Unless or until more Americans use electric cars, they are largely separate markets, so there’s no reason that cheaper oil should cause a major reduction in investment in renewables. The average pump price of a gallon of regular gasoline in the United States was $3.12 this week, down from $3.80 in October 2012 and down from $3.70 just four months ago. In the past, cheaper gasoline has two environmentally problematic effects: It leads people to drive thirstier cars and trucks and to drive them more miles. This time may be different. The number of miles Americans drive per capita has declined for nine straight years dropping from roughly 10,100 miles in 2004 to about 9,400 miles in 2013. A change that significant suggests a change in lifestyle—one that would be hard to upend. In addition, the average fuel economy of new cars and trucks sold in the United States has increased markedly over the past decade—in contrast to the 1990s, when new-vehicle fuel economy essentially flat-lined. Today, the average new car sold in this country goes 36 miles on a gallon of gasoline, up from 29.5 mpg in 2004. "Times have changed since the dawn of the last era of cheap oil," says Jeffrey Ball. "Even assuming low oil prices are the new normal, a cleaner energy system probably is too."

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by LoRdTAW on Tuesday December 02 2014, @01:07PM

    by LoRdTAW (3755) on Tuesday December 02 2014, @01:07PM (#121821) Journal

    will never be a serious contender in the used market where most of your poor (who drive the most gas guzzlers because that is all they can afford) get their cars.

    Define gas guzzling. Where I live they mostly drive around in pretty efficient cars, mostly older 90's Japanese cars such as Hondas and Toyotas. And not all of them are younger kids in wanna be ricers. Up until recently I ran around in a 95 Civic and sold it to a kid for $500 who was ecstatic to get a black 2 door civic with a stick.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by Hairyfeet on Thursday December 04 2014, @06:07AM

    by Hairyfeet (75) <bassbeast1968NO@SPAMgmail.com> on Thursday December 04 2014, @06:07AM (#122472) Journal

    I was going by the DOT numbers which stated last I looked that the average car used by those making less than $25k a year (your working poor) has an average MPG of just 23mpg, lower than pretty much anywhere on the planet. Next time you are driving by a used car lot, the type that brags "got a job get a car" see what kind of vehicles you see, yours is the exception NOT the rule I'm afraid.

    And again this frankly could be fixed in less than 5 years, a single small diesel truck chassis could be the base for a "peoples vehicle" that would easily get 35+ MPG, probably over 40MPG if you choose the right engine AND you could cover a good 80% of the use cases, from your poor mom with 4 kids to the guy hauling trash, you just wouldn't get Solyndra style kickbacks from it. BTW just FYI might want to look and see how much the big donors got from the POTUS for their "green initiatives", biggest payout since Nixon. Sadly the more things change...

    --
    ACs are never seen so don't bother. Always ready to show SJWs for the racists they are.