Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Thursday December 04 2014, @07:28PM   Printer-friendly
from the its-who-you-know-and-what-you-know dept.

The NYT reports that NY County District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr.’s most significant initiative has been to transform, through the use of data, the way district attorneys fight crime. “The question I had when I came in was, Do we sit on our hands waiting for crime to tick up, or can we do something to drive crime lower?” says Vance. “I wanted to develop what I call intelligence-driven prosecution.” When Vance became DA in 2009, it was glaringly evident that assistant D.A.s fielding the 105,000-plus cases a year in Manhattan seldom had enough information to make nuanced decisions about bail, charges, pleas or sentences. They were narrowly focused on the facts of cases in front of them, not on the people committing the crimes. They couldn’t quickly sort minor delinquents from irredeemably bad apples. They didn’t know what havoc defendants might be wreaking in other boroughs.

Vance divided Manhattan’s 22 police precincts into five areas and assigned a senior assistant D.A. and an analyst to map the crime in each area. CSU staff members met with patrol officers, detectives and Police Department field intelligence officers and asked police commanders to submit a list of each precinct’s 25 worst offenders — so-called crime drivers, whose “incapacitation by the criminal-justice system would have a positive impact on the community’s safety.” Seeded with these initial cases, the CSU built a searchable database that now includes more than 9,000 chronic offenders (PDF), virtually all of whom have criminal records. A large percentage are recidivists who have been repeatedly convicted of grand larceny, one of the top index crimes in Manhattan, but the list also includes active gang members, people whom the D.A. considers “uncooperative witnesses,” and a fluctuating number of violent “priority targets,” which currently stands at 81. “These are people we want to know about if they are arrested,” says Kerry Chicon. “We are constantly adding, deleting, editing and updating the intelligence in the Arrest Alert System. If someone gets out of a gang, or goes to prison for a long time, or moves out of the city or the state, or ages out of being a focus for us, or dies, we edit the system accordingly — we do that all the time.”

“It’s the ‘Moneyball’ approach to crime,” says Chauncey Parker. “The tool is data; the benefit, public safety and justice — whom are we going to put in jail? If you have 10 guys dealing drugs, which one do you focus on? The assistant district attorneys know the rap sheets, they have the police statements like before, but now they know if you lift the left sleeve you’ll find a gang tattoo and if you look you’ll see a scar where the defendant was once shot in the ankle. Some of the defendants are often surprised we know so much about them.”

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 4, Interesting) by Sir Garlon on Thursday December 04 2014, @09:31PM

    by Sir Garlon (1264) on Thursday December 04 2014, @09:31PM (#122708)

    How does US policing look to you lately?

    It looks to me like the Staten Island police can't tell the difference between a nonviolent seller of unlicensed cigarettes and a hardened criminal. If police can be trained to make more accurate threat assessments instead of relying on their emotions, I'm in favor of it.

    Data has the possibility of showing that black and Hispanic men are not the enemy.

    --
    [Sir Garlon] is the marvellest knight that is now living, for he destroyeth many good knights, for he goeth invisible.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +2  
       Interesting=2, Total=2
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   4  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 05 2014, @07:54AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 05 2014, @07:54AM (#122864)

    Data has the possibility of showing that black and Hispanic men are not the enemy.

    0) Most people have a habit of looking at data and seeing what they want to see.

    1) If the police have a lot of racists and bigots, the data would be biased in the first place

    2) Too many blacks are the enemy. If you don't believe me, go look up the stats on who kills the most blacks. It's black guys, not white police officers. Too many blacks promote a self-destructive culture that keeps them down.

    Of course the total damage these blacks do may actually not be many times more than a few corrupt white bankers ;). How many billions of USD were "lost"? Guess where the money goes when they play pass the parcel with your retirement savings.

  • (Score: 2) by FatPhil on Friday December 05 2014, @01:59PM

    by FatPhil (863) <pc-soylentNO@SPAMasdf.fi> on Friday December 05 2014, @01:59PM (#122912) Homepage
    > Data has the possibility of showing that black and Hispanic men are not the enemy.

    However, it also has the possibility of showing that people with low birth weight are the enemy. Data has almost infinite possibilities.
    --
    I know I'm God, because every time I pray to him, I find I'm talking to myself.