Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by hubie on Tuesday October 04 2022, @03:51PM   Printer-friendly
from the methanol-fueled dept.

Can methanol move beyond its dirty roots?

The potential for clean production is what makes methanol desirable as a fuel. It's not just a more efficient way to use energy, but also a way to remove existing CO2 from the air. To reach carbon neutrality by 2060, as China has promised, the country can't put all its eggs in one basket, like EVs. Popularizing the use of methanol fuel and the clean production of methanol may enable China to hit its target sooner.

But the future is not all bright and green. Currently, the majority of methanol in China is still made by burning coal. [...]

But as Bromberg says, unlike gas and diesel, at least methanol has the potential to be green. [...]

"If that is not an intention—if people are not going to pursue low-carbon methanol—you really don't want to implement methanol at all," Bromberg says.

Methanol fuel also has other potential drawbacks. It has a lower energy density than gasoline or diesel, requiring bigger, heavier fuel tanks—or drivers may need to refuel more often. This also effectively prevents methanol from being used as an airplane fuel.

[...] Beyond China, some other countries, like Germany and Denmark, are also exploring the potential of methanol fuels. China, though, is at least one step ahead of the rest—even if it remains a big question whether it will replicate its success in developing EVs or follow the path of another country with a major auto industry.


Original Submission

 
This discussion was created by hubie (1068) for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by mcgrew on Wednesday October 05 2022, @07:21PM

    by mcgrew (701) <publish@mcgrewbooks.com> on Wednesday October 05 2022, @07:21PM (#1275078) Homepage Journal

    AFAIC the piston engine is dead. It's an over a century old obsolete Rube Goldberg device with way too many moving parts and points of failure. I hate all the routine maintenance piston engines require, but I hate even worse having to fuel the damned thing in sub-freezing weather. I also hated paying almost $900 for a fuel pump, which all piston internal combustion engines require.

    These alternative fuel engines don't get rid of global warming (but neither will my coal-powered electric car when I can actually BUY one, waiting list) and have few if any advantages to gasoline and diesel, maybe none, and all of the disadvantages from a user's point of view.

    I wondered why nobody is advertising the advantages of electric cars, and found that they can't make them fast enough. I'm on the waiting list for the cheapest EV on the market, and you'll have to wait for a Tesla, too.

    You guys know that an electric motor has one moving part. Mr. Goldberg can keep his pistons.

    --
    mcgrewbooks.com mcgrew.info nooze.org
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2