Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 10 submissions in the queue.
posted by janrinok on Monday December 15 2014, @03:58PM   Printer-friendly
from the chasing-the-vanishing-jobs? dept.

Binyamin Appelbaum writes at the NYT that the share of prime-age men — those 25 to 54 years old — who are not working has more than tripled since the late 1960s, to 16 percent as many men have decided that low-wage work will not improve their lives, in part because deep changes in American society have made it easier for them to live without working. These changes include the availability of federal disability benefits; the decline of marriage, which means fewer men provide for children; and the rise of the Internet, which has reduced the isolation of unemployment. Technology has made unemployment less lonely says Tyler Cowen, an economist at George Mason University, who argues that the Internet allows men to entertain themselves and find friends and sexual partners at a much lower cost than did previous generations. Perhaps most important, it has become harder for men to find higher-paying jobs as foreign competition and technological advances have eliminated many of the jobs open to high school graduates. The trend was pushed to new heights by the last recession, with 20 percent of prime-age men not working in 2009 before partly receding. But the recovery is unlikely to be complete. "Like turtles flipped onto their backs, many people who stop working struggle to get back on their feet," writes Appelbaum. "Some people take years to return to the work force, and others never do "

A study published in October by scholars at the American Enterprise Institute and the Institute for Family Studies estimated that 37 percent of the decline in male employment since 1979 can be explained by this retreat from marriage and fatherhood (PDF). “When the legal, entry-level economy isn’t providing a wage that allows someone a convincing and realistic option to become an adult — to go out and get married and form a household — it demoralizes them and shunts them into illegal economies,” says Philippe Bourgois, an anthropologist who has studied the lives of young men in urban areas. “It’s not a choice that has made them happy. They would much rather be adults in a respectful job that pays them and promises them benefits.”

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Interesting) by GungnirSniper on Monday December 15 2014, @06:45PM

    by GungnirSniper (1671) on Monday December 15 2014, @06:45PM (#126249) Journal

    Breitbart.com has recently published The Sexodus [breitbart.com] (Part 2) [breitbart.com] about the frustrations of being male in our society, and the poorer deal in the social contract it now involves. The article rationalizes the societal retreat due to a number of factors. Here's a list that will spin the heads of every social justice warrior in the tumblr-sewer:

    • Infant boys' genitals can be mutilated for profit, but infant girls' genitals are Federally protected. [cornell.edu]
    • Primary school favors girls since the teachers are overwhelmingly female. Many boys are medicated for attention deficit disorder, as they are negatively compared to the girls by female teachers.
    • Zero Tolerance in education, which is a fear-based policy, is far more likely to lead to severe punishments for boys than girls. What would have been a home suspension is now an expulsion.
    • Teachers' Unions stand in the way of change, preferring their existing methods to more modern ones that might better connect with boys.
    • Women now earn more college degrees than men. [ed.gov] Yet many of these are in lower-paying fields like early childhood education, allowing the overall average wage by gender to remain in the men's favor. This overall average is where the 'women are underpaid' concept retains its staying power from, but when we look at specific fields, the gap is significantly narrowed. If we count career hours, it disappears entirely.
    • Women are now the predominant group in subsets of one of the largest growth industries - medicine. The average new Pharmacist is a woman, as are most Nurse Practitioners and Physician Assistants. [googleusercontent.com] Anything above nursing used to be strongly dominated by men.
    • As some single women become more successful, they become pickier, looking for men even more successful than they are. Yet there are fewer of those quality men available as a generation ago. As these women age, those men are going to look for younger women, so she settles for a man who can pay the bills but leaves her unfulfilled. This leads to unhappiness on both sides.
    • On the reverse side, moderately successful single men are left with the remaining supply of women. A section of those women are so used to being chased by men they do not feel the need to improve themselves, since they can easily jump to the next man.
    • Zero Tolerance sexual harassment laws are making even flirting at work into lawsuit potential. Both in and out of the workplace, it is only harassment if the woman does not find the man attractive.
    • Alcohol-influenced sex that is later regretted by the female is assumed to be the responsibility of the male, even if both were equally intoxicated. Just an allegation can lead to loss of scholarship, college expulsion, or worse.
    • Dating is a frustrating and expensive exercise for many men, particularly those who listen to what women say they want rather than what they biologically desire. Our society teaches the White Knight myth that women want a chivalrous man, but the reality is women want to be led by an irrationally confident man. [youtube.com] In dating, the nice guys do finish last. [wordpress.com] It is easier for non-dominant males to say 'fuck it' and enjoy Reddit GoneWild instead.
    • Thanks to testosterone, men are more likely to get into physical fights, as well as get injured, over women, money, and lesser things.
    • In divorce, the children are often given to the mother solely based on societal views that women are more nurturing. This can be done even with clear evidence to the contrary regarding the woman involved.
    • Thanks to domestic violence laws and restraining orders handed out based on an overabundance of caution, women have an additional weapon in their legal arsenal. I've heard of this used against a father for the crime of even attending the same school play as the mother. Though he was over 100 feet away, it was still the same room. Women apparently do not have a legal responsibility to maintain distance or move away, since the law assumes legitimate fear on the woman's part and thus she would move away automatically.
    • A woman with a restraining order can also bait a man by contacting him while the restraining order is in effect, for example to 'work things out', without being in violation herself. So if he responds to her direct attempt at conversation by one form or another, he is guilty of violation. If this were done by the police, it would stink of entrapment.
    • In many states, the marital home often goes to the parent with primary custody, so with the existing pro-female bias, the men are turned out on the streets regards of the at-fault party.
    • By the same cultural biases, it is easier for a woman to get time off to care for a sick child than a man. Or at least, the man will be looked down upon for doing so by his peers of both genders.
    • Men are much more likely to have a dangerous job and be injured or die from it. [smh.com.au] Emergency services, construction, and wood processing claim many lives.
    • Across the world, men die younger than women [wikipedia.org]. In the US, women live nearly five years longer, on average.
    • Men are also likely to more likely to successfully commit suicide [wikipedia.org] although women make more overall attempts (or 'cries for help').

    So where in this deal are the parts men are supposed to look forward to?

    A sci-fi future with redheaded sex robots, genetically-enhanced cloning, and gestation-to-birth incubators sounds pretty good. #nowomenrequired

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +3  
       Interesting=3, Total=3
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   5  
  • (Score: 1) by mechanicjay on Monday December 15 2014, @07:00PM

    Thank You.

    --
    My VMS box beat up your Windows box.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 15 2014, @07:16PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 15 2014, @07:16PM (#126263)

    Seriously, Dude,

    Breitbart.com has recently published

    There's your problem, right there! What are you doing citing such a right-wing, reactionary, red-baiting, sexist, and anti-intellectual source? Do you think you have friends on the internet?

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 15 2014, @07:25PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 15 2014, @07:25PM (#126265)

      Would you please pick a few of those points and refute them?

      I'll also tack on to the circumcision thing. In 2012, I learned that as a culture, we'd rather circumcise infant boys (a procedure that goes wrong 1/500 times) to protect women from a sexually transmitted disease that can lead to cervical cancer than simply vaccinate both genders at age 12. That's pretty sick.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 15 2014, @07:27PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 15 2014, @07:27PM (#126267)

      Yeah, that's great! Let's not talk about any of the points in that message, just wave your hands about breitbart and everything will go away.

      Very typical extremist (in your case, left-wing extremist) stance, there. It illustrates in a very succinct way, the primary form of "argument" used by your kind.

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 15 2014, @09:29PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 15 2014, @09:29PM (#126313)

        It's not a left-wing extremist stance, you cock.

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 15 2014, @09:54PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 15 2014, @09:54PM (#126322)

        It illustrates in a very succinct way, the primary form of "argument" used by your kind.

        Thank you. I am not sure if you are saying, "Yes, I have no friends" or "Yes, all my friends are on the internet". Could you clarify?

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 15 2014, @09:26PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 15 2014, @09:26PM (#126312)

    Alcohol-influenced sex that is later regretted by the female is assumed to be the responsibility of the male, even if both were equally intoxicated. Just an allegation can lead to loss of scholarship, college expulsion, or worse.

    A friend-of-a-friend was charged with rape by a girl, after an encounter at a nightclub in town. My friend, a witness, was interviewed by the police, and his statement was that the girl started getting really amorous with his friend, then literally dragged him off to the toilets, and they both came back with dishevelled hair. She spent the rest of the night cuddling into the guy.

    Apparently, the next day she woke up, decided that she wouldn't have done that and it was the guy's fault and rang the police.

    This only ended well when the the girl's flatmate talked to my friend, then rang the police and explained to them that this particular girl had done this same thing at least three times previously - she goes out with her friends, gets drunk, latches onto the nearest guy, drags him off for a quick fuck, and then realizes (after she sobers up) that she wouldn't have done that if she was sober so clearly he raped her.

    The case was thrown out based on that testimony. My friend rang the police and asked them if that information would be introduced to the cases on the former complainants, to which the police responded "Only if they ask for it, otherwise no."

    Gotta get those convictions.

    In divorce, the children are often given to the mother solely based on societal views that women are more nurturing. This can be done even with clear evidence to the contrary regarding the woman involved.

    My mother was awarded custody in spite of significant evidence that she was mentally unbalanced. (See below.) She's stamped on my (then 2-year-old) head, giving me at least a moderate brain injury, she often played mind games against her children (not telling us something and then ridiculing us for carrying on with the information we had). She had a partner who was violent toward us (he'd slam me head first into walls as punishment, as a 5 year old) and did nothing to prevent it. She lied in court, lied to the police, the judge called her mad (to which her lawyer responded with "I know!"). When I was fifteen, she told me that if I "really want to get someone, get them to touch you and then punch yourself lightly on the same spot until a bruise appears."

    She set fire to my bedroom just so she could have an excuse to move out of the house, gave the local (country) cop a lie that made no sense, and he investigated no further.

    When they first divorced, she was given the house that was being paid for by my father, and she eventually sold it. I moved once a year, every year, until I was at high school, once we moved just across the road.

    The courts felt that, even with the evidence that she is a nutjob, she would look after us better than my father could have (he's a binge alcoholic).

    A woman with a restraining order can also bait a man by contacting him while the restraining order is in effect, for example to 'work things out', without being in violation herself. So if he responds to her direct attempt at conversation by one form or another, he is guilty of violation. If this were done by the police, it would stink of entrapment.

    My mother did this to my father, a number of times. I can vaguely recall one incident (my brother remembers it more clearly).

    Once, she rang him at work (not realising she had an audience) and invited him over to view some of my school work, while my brother was at pre-school.

    He got back to work to find the police waiting, who arrested and charged him for beating her up.

    In court, she turned up covered in bruises. It was discovered that she'd beaten herself up (!!) and then had him arrested for it, just to get at him. It wasn't even the first time she'd done, but the only time it was proved.

    • (Score: 2) by mhajicek on Monday December 15 2014, @11:40PM

      by mhajicek (51) on Monday December 15 2014, @11:40PM (#126346)

      You should play Binding of Isaac.

      --
      The spacelike surfaces of time foliations can have a cusp at the surface of discontinuity. - P. Hajicek
  • (Score: 1) by goody on Tuesday December 16 2014, @04:56AM

    by goody (2135) on Tuesday December 16 2014, @04:56AM (#126416)

    Yea, it often sucks to be a male.....and still most every male in the world would rather be male than female. Buck up.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday December 16 2014, @07:16AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday December 16 2014, @07:16AM (#126428)

    After reading that, it looks more and more like homosexuality will be the relief mechanism for my generation.

    It is a very lonely thing to go through life unloved, but the barriers to heterosexual relationships erected by lawmakers look to make same-sex companionship look much better.

    I have seen lots of YouTube videos describing how the 1 percenters are going to do away with the "eaters". I thoroughly believe the law and liability I am seeing is the result of this, as within a generation, population should begin dropping as the middle classes cease to reproduce. The government will then consist of two distinct classes - the elite, and the drones to service them, and as long as they can maintain the surveillance technologies to keep the drones controlled, it looks like the elite can continue the good life from the blood, sweat, and tears of those who have swallowed the kool-aid of debt and usury. A stable population of drones can be assured by crediting benefits to the drone-mother for each baby produced.