Slash Boxes

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 14 submissions in the queue.
posted by Cactus on Saturday March 08 2014, @02:00AM   Printer-friendly
from the is-it-plugged-in? dept.

martyb writes:

"Remember that one bug that had you tearing your hair out and banging your head against the wall for the longest time? And how it felt when you finally solved it? Here's a chance to share your greatest frustration and triumph with the community.

One that I vividly recall occurred back in the early 90's at a startup that was developing custom PBX hardware and software. There was the current development prototype rack and another rack for us in Quality Assurance (QA). Our shipping deadline for a major client was fast approaching, and the pressure level was high as development released the latest hardware and software for us to test. We soon discovered that our system would not boot up successfully. We were getting all kinds of errors; different errors each time. Development's machine booted just fine, *every* time. We swapped out our hard disks, the power supply, the main processing board, the communications boards, and finally the entire backplane in which all of these were housed. The days passed and the system still failed to boot up successfully and gave us different errors on each reboot.

What could it be? We were all stymied and frustrated as the deadline loomed before us. It was then that I noticed the power strips on each rack into which all the frames and power supplies were plugged. The power strip on the dev server was 12-gauge (i.e. could handle 20 amps) but the one on the QA rack was only 14-gauge (15 amps). The power draw caused by spinning up the drives was just enough to leave the system board under-powered for bootup.

We swapped in a new $10 power strip and it worked perfectly. And we made the deadline, too!

So, fellow Soylents, what have you got? Share your favorite tale of woe and success and finally bask in the glory you deserve."

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Informative) by FuckBeta on Saturday March 08 2014, @05:04PM

    by FuckBeta (1504) on Saturday March 08 2014, @05:04PM (#13228) Homepage

    From: Trey Harris

    Here's a problem that *sounded* impossible... I almost regret posting
    the story to a wide audience, because it makes a great tale over drinks
    at a conference. :-) The story is slightly altered in order to protect
    the guilty, elide over irrelevant and boring details, and generally make
    the whole thing more entertaining.

    I was working in a job running the campus email system some years ago
    when I got a call from the chairman of the statistics department.

    "We're having a problem sending email out of the department."

    "What's the problem?" I asked.

    "We can't send mail more than 500 miles," the chairman explained.

    I choked on my latte. "Come again?"

    "We can't send mail farther than 500 miles from here," he repeated. "A
    little bit more, actually. Call it 520 miles. But no farther."

    "Um... Email really doesn't work that way, generally," I said, trying
    to keep panic out of my voice. One doesn't display panic when speaking
    to a department chairman, even of a relatively impoverished department
    like statistics. "What makes you think you can't send mail more than
    500 miles?"

    "It's not what I *think*," the chairman replied testily. "You see, when
    we first noticed this happening, a few days ago--"

    "You waited a few DAYS?" I interrupted, a tremor tinging my voice. "And
    you couldn't send email this whole time?"

    "We could send email. Just not more than--"

    "--500 miles, yes," I finished for him, "I got that. But why didn't
    you call earlier?"

    "Well, we hadn't collected enough data to be sure of what was going on
    until just now." Right. This is the chairman of *statistics*. "Anyway,
    I asked one of the geostatisticians to look into it--"


    "--yes, and she's produced a map showing the radius within which we can
    send email to be slightly more than 500 miles. There are a number of
    destinations within that radius that we can't reach, either, or reach
    sporadically, but we can never email farther than this radius."

    "I see," I said, and put my head in my hands. "When did this start?
    A few days ago, you said, but did anything change in your systems at
    that time?"

    "Well, the consultant came in and patched our server and rebooted it.
    But I called him, and he said he didn't touch the mail system."

    "Okay, let me take a look, and I'll call you back," I said, scarcely
    believing that I was playing along. It wasn't April Fool's Day. I
    tried to remember if someone owed me a practical joke.

    I logged into their department's server, and sent a few test mails.
    This was in the Research Triangle of North Carolina, and a test mail to
    my own account was delivered without a hitch. Ditto for one sent to
    Richmond, and Atlanta, and Washington. Another to Princeton (400 miles)

    But then I tried to send an email to Memphis (600 miles). It failed.
    Boston, failed. Detroit, failed. I got out my address book and started
    trying to narrow this down. New York (420 miles) worked, but Providence
    (580 miles) failed.

    I was beginning to wonder if I had lost my sanity. I tried emailing a
    friend who lived in North Carolina, but whose ISP was in Seattle.
    Thankfully, it failed. If the problem had had to do with the geography
    of the human recipient and not his mail server, I think I would have
    broken down in tears.

    Having established that -- unbelievably -- the problem as reported was
    true, and repeatable, I took a look at the file. It looked
    fairly normal. In fact, it looked familiar.

    I diffed it against the in my home directory. It hadn't been
    altered -- it was a I had written. And I was fairly certain
    I hadn't enabled the "FAIL_MAIL_OVER_500_MILES" option. At a loss, I
    telnetted into the SMTP port. The server happily responded with a SunOS
    sendmail banner.

    Wait a minute... a SunOS sendmail banner? At the time, Sun was still
    shipping Sendmail 5 with its operating system, even though Sendmail 8 was
    fairly mature. Being a good system administrator, I had standardized on
    Sendmail 8. And also being a good system administrator, I had written a that used the nice long self-documenting option and variable
    names available in Sendmail 8 rather than the cryptic punctuation-mark
    codes that had been used in Sendmail 5.

    The pieces fell into place, all at once, and I again choked on the dregs
    of my now-cold latte. When the consultant had "patched the server," he
    had apparently upgraded the version of SunOS, and in so doing
    *downgraded* Sendmail. The upgrade helpfully left the
    alone, even though it was now the wrong version.

    It so happens that Sendmail 5 -- at least, the version that Sun shipped,
    which had some tweaks -- could deal with the Sendmail 8, as
    most of the rules had at that point remained unaltered. But the new
    long configuration options -- those it saw as junk, and skipped. And
    the sendmail binary had no defaults compiled in for most of these, so,
    finding no suitable settings in the file, they were set to

    One of the settings that was set to zero was the timeout to connect to
    the remote SMTP server. Some experimentation established that on this
    particular machine with its typical load, a zero timeout would abort a
    connect call in slightly over three milliseconds.

    An odd feature of our campus network at the time was that it was 100%
    switched. An outgoing packet wouldn't incur a router delay until hitting
    the POP and reaching a router on the far side. So time to connect to a
    lightly-loaded remote host on a nearby network would actually largely be
    governed by the speed of light distance to the destination rather than by
    incidental router delays.

    Feeling slightly giddy, I typed into my shell:

    $ units
    1311 units, 63 prefixes

    You have: 3 millilightseconds
    You want: miles
                    * 558.84719
                    / 0.0017893979

    "500 miles, or a little bit more."

    Trey Harris
    I'm looking for work. If you need a SAGE Level IV with 10 years Perl,
    tool development, training, and architecture experience, please email
    me at I'm willing to relocate for the right opportunity.

    -- []

    Quit Slashdot...because Fuck Beta!
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +2  
       Informative=2, Funny=1, Overrated=1, Total=4
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   3