Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Saturday March 18 2023, @07:37PM   Printer-friendly
from the tinker-tailor-soldier-sailor dept.

Chances its Arm that maker community is looking for a fresh SBC:

Asus has unveiled a RISC-V model in its range of Tinker Board single board computer (SBC) systems, which up until now have all been Arm-based. However, it seems users should not expect too much in the way of performance from this first device.

The Tinker Board has been around since 2017 as Asus' answer to the Raspberry Pi, even keeping the same form factor and GPIO pinout in some models. Like the Pi, they have been based on various Arm-based system-on-chip (SoC) hardware.

Announced this week, the Tinker V is powered by a 64-bit RISC-V chip and aimed at embedded and IoT applications, but like other Tinker Boards and the Raspberry PI, is likely to find its way into the hands of makers and enthusiasts as well.

According to Asus, Tinker V "provides impressive power, comprehensive functionality and rich connectivity, making it the perfect choice for a diverse range of industrial IoT applications".

However, it is based on a 1GHz Renesas RZ/Five chip, which has just a single CPU core, the AX45MP designed by Andes Technology, whereas most rival products sport multiple processor cores.

Tinker V also features 1GB of DDR4 memory and an optional 16GB eMMC SSD, plus a range of I/O including GPIO ports on a 20 pin header, micro-USB, dual gigabit Ethernet ports, a pair of CAN bus interfaces and two RS232 ports, all on a Pico-ITX board.

As befits its intended purpose as an IoT platform, the system supports Yocto Linux as well as the Debian distribution, Asus said. It also lacks a display output, unlike many other Tinker Board models. Full specifications for Tinker V can be found here.

Asus said it is offering at least five years of support for Tinker V, plus dedicated on-site technical support is also available to shorten customer development cycles and accelerate application deployment.

The move shows that the RISC-V open-source instruction set architecture continues to garner support. The last RISC-V Summit in San Jose saw the launch of a family of datacenter-class processors based on the architecture from Ventana Micro Systems, while XMOS unveiled new high-performance microcontrollers using RISC-V.

According to Asus, Tinker V samples will be available in Q2 of this year, but it did not disclose a date for full availability or pricing.


Original Submission

 
This discussion was created by janrinok (52) for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1)
  • (Score: 5, Informative) by RamiK on Saturday March 18 2023, @08:44PM (1 child)

    by RamiK (1813) on Saturday March 18 2023, @08:44PM (#1296949)

    They've launched two separate products:
    1. Tinker V RISC-V: Single 1GHz core.
    2. Tinker board 3: quad-core ARM + Mali-G52 GPU.

    The ARM board might rival the raspi in some capacities, but the RISC-v board certainly doesn't by any means.

    --
    compiling...
    • (Score: 2) by Opportunist on Sunday March 19 2023, @11:14AM

      by Opportunist (5545) on Sunday March 19 2023, @11:14AM (#1297030)

      It sure beats the RasPi in one field, the one that pretty much any SBC beats it:

      Availability.

      I stopped comparing SBCs to RasPis. It's like comparing your car to some fabled hand-crafted models. Sure, they may be better, but your chance to ever have one is zero, so why bother comparing it to them. Compare SBCs to other SBCs you could get instead, that's way more sensible.

  • (Score: 2) by turgid on Sunday March 19 2023, @10:33AM (2 children)

    by turgid (4318) Subscriber Badge on Sunday March 19 2023, @10:33AM (#1297027) Journal

    It's a 1GHz RISC. It's not slow by any definition of the word. My first computer had an 8-bit Z80 CPU running at 3.25MHz. The shortest instruction, NOP, which did nothing, took four clock cycles to execute. If you think a 1GHz 32-bit RISC is "slow" you're programming it wrong. It's probably at least 10 000 times as fast as that Z80.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday March 19 2023, @02:51PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Sunday March 19 2023, @02:51PM (#1297050)

      Most would prefer a 1.5 to 3 GHz quad-core with 2 to 8 GB RAM for a desktop. It's clearly not made for that purpose since it has no display output. It's an industrial IoT board.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday March 19 2023, @08:46PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Sunday March 19 2023, @08:46PM (#1297073)
      "Slow" depends on what you plan to do with it. For its intended purpose in embedded systems and as an industrial IoT platform, it is probably not slow at all, probably plenty fast for all except for the most demanding of applications. However, some people use Raspberry Pis as lightweight desktop Linux systems, HTPC boxes, game emulators, etc., and for that I doubt you'll be able to use the Tinker V easily, due to its lack of a GPU or additional cores. It's probably too slow to be useful as a cryptocurrency miner (again, doesn't even have a GPU) or as a computing cluster node either.
(1)