Earlier this week we received a leaked presentation covering the results of a Google Fiber survey conducted on behalf of Warner Bros and Sony Pictures Entertainment. The research was conducted in 2012 and aimed to get a baseline of the piracy levels, so changes can be measured after the rollout.
[...] Drawing on an MPAA formula that counts all pirated views as losses the report notes that it may cost Hollywood over a billion dollars per year. That’s a rather impressive increase of 58% compared to current piracy levels. The research also finds a link between piracy and broadband speeds, which is another reason for Hollywood not to like Google’s Internet service.
[...] What’s most striking from the above approach is the way the studios frame Google Fiber as a piracy threat, instead of looking at the opportunities it offers.
(Score: 2) by meisterister on Friday January 02 2015, @06:13PM
I don't pirate movies for two reasons:
1. There's nothing worthwhile to pirate.
2. I still have a VCR and movies on VHS are insanely cheap (I got the Star Wars trilogy as a boxed set for $2)
(May or may not have been) Posted from my K6-2, Athlon XP, or Pentium I/II/III.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 02 2015, @09:35PM
Yes, there's nothing quite like losing almost a quarter of the screen and not being able to see much detail to make a movie look stunning.