Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Sunday May 28 2023, @06:41AM   Printer-friendly

'We haven't been taught about sex': Teens talk about how to fix school sex education:

Last week, the Albanese government announced an expert panel to support relationships and sexuality education in Australian schools.

The group is lead by the head of anti-violence organization Our Watch, Patty Kinnersly, and includes consent advocate Chanel Contos. It will do a "rapid review" into consent and respectful relationships programs to identify "opportunities for improvement."

This follows a new focus on consent and healthy relationships in Australian schools. The former Coalition government made consent a mandatory part of the curriculum.

We are talking to teenagers about the sex education they receive at schools. This research highlights several areas young people think can be improved. They are particularly concerned sex education most often does not discuss actual sex.

As part of broader, ongoing research into online sexual content, we interviewed 30 West Australian teens (aged 11-17), between 2021 and 2023, to explore their experiences of sex education and where they source information to answer their questions about sex and relationships.

Eighteen interviewees were followed up with 12 months after we had first spoken, to see if their perspectives had changed.

Interviews began as some schools started teaching consent in 2021, with sexual assault being widely debated in the wake of the women's March4Justice rallies around the country and a school sexual assault petition spearheaded by Contos. We have continued to gather young people's perspectives as consent education became mandatory at the start of this school year.

The majority of the young people interviewed told us they were only taught the basics about consent—along the lines of "no means no, and yes means yes." As interviewee Miles* (17) told us:

"It's always broadly talked about [...] but it's never actually talked about what it means and what it actually is."

Nicola (16) added:

"It was more just like if someone says 'no," 'stop' or things like that and if you don't like it say 'no' and things instead of the depths of it."

Consent is complex, so teaching it without necessary detail or context can have devastating results. Some young people may feel unable to say "no" safely in unwanted sexual experiences, and others are genuinely unaware a sexual act occurring, may not be consensual.

At the same time, teens also felt like the focus was on consent at the expense of other information and topics. As Tiffany (14) said,

"The whole thing is consent, 'cos that's such a big thing nowadays [...] we haven't been taught about sex."

Interviewees also felt current sex education was overwhelmingly fear-based and focused on safety. As 15-year-old Lauren explained, she and her classmates had been taught "what could go wrong and not anything else."

"They talk more about sexual violence and sexual assault than they do about sex itself and the benefits of sex and pleasure [...]. It makes it feel like it's bad to have sex and that there's no pleasure in it and it's harmful."

The focus was on risk and biological aspects also left many students confused in terms of how to navigate real-life sexual scenarios safely. As Caris (15) explained:

"It's hard not knowing what to do and where to put yourself and how to move and all of that. It's hard for teenagers and they don't feel comfortable going to their parents."

Warren (17) said this meant teenagers were going online to find more information.

"The lack of education causes the younger generation to resort to online personal education therefore resulting in more negative or destructive sexual encounters."

This echoes a 2021–22 national survey, which found 95% of young Australians thought sex education was an important part of the curriculum. But only 24.8% said their most recent class was "very" or "extremely" relevant to them.

Young people interviewed also felt like their educators did not have enough training to be teaching about relationships and sexuality, which is taught as part of health and physical education from the first year of school to Year 10. As Nicola said,

"It's strange they have sport teachers teaching it, it's not a designated teacher for that program. I think it makes a lot more sense if it's someone who actually is knowledgeable."

[...] There's a common misconception that discussing sex encourages young people to have sex earlier. However, research suggests the opposite and information can actually delay sexual activity. Recent research also shows Australian parents want schools to tackle sex and relationships in more detail and from an early age.

Ultimately, schools need to be able to listen to the concerns of teens to meet their real needs around sex education in ways that are healthy, safe and relevant.


Original Submission

 
This discussion was created by janrinok (52) for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Informative) by Thexalon on Sunday May 28 2023, @10:58AM (2 children)

    by Thexalon (636) on Sunday May 28 2023, @10:58AM (#1308634)

    Based on their age, on average they probably are hoping for more of a practicum on the subject. I know I would have.

    But in all seriousness, if you want to look at what comprehensive sex ed would look like, you'd check out what happens in the Netherlands. Kids learn the scientific names of body parts very early on along with concepts of boundaries of appropriate and inappropriate behavior, with the goal of making sure they know if someone is abusing them and can report it intelligently. As they get older, they get more information about how everything works. The result is that their pregnancy rate is extremely low.

    Meanwhile, in the US there's a lot of "abstinence-only" religiously-based nonsense, which not only is unscientific but also doesn't work.

    --
    The only thing that stops a bad guy with a compiler is a good guy with a compiler.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +3  
       Insightful=1, Interesting=1, Informative=1, Total=3
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   5  
  • (Score: 2) by VLM on Sunday May 28 2023, @03:18PM (1 child)

    by VLM (445) on Sunday May 28 2023, @03:18PM (#1308669)

    in the Netherlands

    The curriculum is strictly centrally state controlled in my state with remarkably little local input and my state both when I was in school and my kids were in school sounds a lot like the Netherlands curriculum you list. Sure local districts can "do what they want" as long as they're willing to give up state money and licensure; LOL that ain't happening. Like how technically every state can set their own statewide drinking age to any age they want, its just the state doesn't get any federal tax money unless its 21, so essentially the feds set the drinking age; likewise the state sets the sex ed curriculum in my state. Doxes me, I donno, doesn't matter really. Probably all states are somewhat different plus or minus federal K12 funding requirements.

    Oddly enough the only determinant of teen pregnancy rate in my state is race. Income has some effect but not much.

    The result is that their pregnancy rate is extremely low.

    I think its low because Netherlander's gonna be Nerlanderians.

    • (Score: 2) by Thexalon on Monday May 29 2023, @02:41PM

      by Thexalon (636) on Monday May 29 2023, @02:41PM (#1308747)

      Oddly enough the only determinant of teen pregnancy rate in my state is race. Income has some effect but not much.

      Where I grew up, it was religiosity: The more overtly Christian they were, the more likely they were to wind up pregnant in high school.

      --
      The only thing that stops a bad guy with a compiler is a good guy with a compiler.