Slash Boxes

SoylentNews is people

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by janrinok on Saturday October 21, @07:41AM (4 children)

    by janrinok (52) Subscriber Badge on Saturday October 21, @07:41AM (#1329617) Journal

    Sorry to hear that janrinok is dead.

    Also incorrect - or a intentional lie.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: -1, Spam) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday October 21, @09:05AM (3 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday October 21, @09:05AM (#1329634)

    If janrinok is not dead, who is this that has taken over his account, given that janrinok is dead, killed by the coward Runaway1956? Inquiring minds want to know.

    • (Score: -1, Spam) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday October 26, @10:27AM (2 children)

      by Anonymous Coward on Thursday October 26, @10:27AM (#1330308)

      Janrinok has offered a truce to aristarchus, on the condition that aristarchus never reveal this to anyone, and never admit that he is aristarchus, forever. That sounds like janrinok has died, if you ask me. Or, at least, the SN is delecta.

      • (Score: 2) by janrinok on Thursday October 26, @11:36AM (1 child)

        by janrinok (52) Subscriber Badge on Thursday October 26, @11:36AM (#1330316) Journal
        This is simply another lie. I had suggested a way in which aristarchus could rejoin the community if he chose to do so. It would include accepting that the 'aristarchus' persona is finished. He would have to comply with all the same rules that others willingly do, and he would have to stop disrupting the site. He was given a month to consider the offer, which was withdrawn after 1 month on 24 Oct. He has not accepted it. It most certainly was not a 'truce' but final chance for aristarchus to show that he was prepared to be a responsible community member.

        on the condition that aristarchus never reveal this to anyone

        Had he accepted the offer, and as he has now broken one of the stipulated conditions within it, any account that he had created would have been disabled, as was clearly explained clearly to him. Last night, after the Governance meeting, ari tried to protest his innocence again []. I don't think he expected the response that he was given, which was not positive. He also said:

        21:41:49 [CET] aristarchus: I have never sockpuppeted. Only had alternate usernames, only one at a time, to replace banned ones.

        My response today is:

        Except for Mockingbird, Eratosthanes, Anti-Aristarchus, TheMightyChickadee and of course, aristarchus itself which have all existed at the same time because they often moderated each other (moderation abuse), exhanged comments in support of each other, and abused others by attempting to prevent them expressing their views. They were all identified as being your account or sock puppets.

        Mockingbird and Eratosthanes also positively moderated and supported some of the FYN series of accounts, which are also yours. Mind you, you do complain about others and accuse them of having racist views. Yet you are perhaps the most racist person that we have on the site.

        There are other groupings of your sock puppets that behaved in the same manner (birds, stones, historical figures, anime figures etc). In fact, you have accounts which are still usable which is why we can justify disabling your sock-puppets. You just seem to have forgotten which accounts you have created.

        Another one of your lies countered. And furthermore, your comment is from one of your previous sock puppets from a hash which was frequently used by 'Frigatebird' and which no-one else has ever used to access this site.

        But he wasn't banned for any of this. He was banned for doxxing, and it is something that he is still attempting to do. In the last few days he has submitted a 'story' attempting to dox a community member again. He is repeatedly doing so in comments and elsewhere too. We do not draw attention to them because that will only give them more publicity. He has not changed his ways, nor do we now expect him to do so.

        He has been treated fairly and we have given him ample opportunities to rejoin the community under the same terms as everyone else. He will remain banned - and today's sock-puppet (Neuvoaristarchus) is also disabled.

        • (Score: -1, Spam) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday October 26, @08:05PM

          by Anonymous Coward on Thursday October 26, @08:05PM (#1330381)

          Amazing how incorrect your accusations are! Is there some sort of derangement syndrome at work here? Are you sure you banned all the accounts? I mean, all the aristarchus accounts? Is the new policy to spam mod and delete any post that even so much as mentions aristarchus? Will you continue to dig a hole, ban new users, and drive away all but the right-wingers who have already been banned everywhere else?

          Keep up the good work, janrinok! I am sure Active Staff everywhere support your efforts!