Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by hubie on Wednesday October 18 2023, @09:44AM   Printer-friendly
from the your-ban-is-now-irrelevant dept.

After ChatGPT disruption, Stack Overflow lays off 28 percent of staff:

Stack Overflow used to be every developer's favorite site for coding help, but with the rise of generative AI like ChatGPT, chatbots can offer more specific help than a 5-year-old forum post ever could.

[...] You might think of Stack Overflow as "just a forum," but the company is working on a direct answer to ChatGPT in the form of "Overflow AI," which was announced in July. Stack Overflow's profitability plan includes cutting costs, and that's the justification for the layoffs. Stack Overflow doubled its headcount in 2022 with 525 people. ChatGPT launched at the end of 2022, making for unfortunate timing.

[... ] OpenAI is working on web crawler controls for ChatGPT, which would let sites like Stack Overflow opt out of crawling. [...] Chandrasekar has argued that sites like Stack Overflow are essential for chatbots, saying they need "to be trained on something that's progressing knowledge forward. They need new knowledge to be created."


Original Submission #1Original Submission #2

 
This discussion was created by hubie (1068) for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Interesting) by tangomargarine on Wednesday October 18 2023, @03:07PM (2 children)

    by tangomargarine (667) on Wednesday October 18 2023, @03:07PM (#1329286)

    with the rise of generative AI like ChatGPT, chatbots can offer more specific help than a 5-year-old forum post ever could.

    Doesn't ChatGPT just crawl forum posts like this to find an answer, instead of actually making it up itself? So without said 5-year-old forum posts, ChatGPT can't answer the question.

    Also I wish everybody would shut the hell up about their ChatGPT boner. It's like trying to write a script in bash--there are 5 different ways to solve every problem, only 4 of them are subtly wrong. I'm not going to answer somebody's question about how to solve a problem in bash with "well, here's the 5 options: figure it out yourself".

    It's fine as a novelty, but I don't want to try to actually solve my problem with ChatGPT.

    --
    "Is that really true?" "I just spent the last hour telling you to think for yourself! Didn't you hear anything I said?"
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +3  
       Insightful=1, Interesting=2, Total=3
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   5  
  • (Score: 2) by GloomMower on Wednesday October 18 2023, @05:03PM (1 child)

    by GloomMower (17961) on Wednesday October 18 2023, @05:03PM (#1329301)

    I hear ChatGPT-4 is better with code. I've only tried the free ChatGPT-3.5, which I don't think is as good. Also I think when people mention chat-gpt and code they mean it to include other generative AI stuff, like copilot as well. Maybe someone can reply with their experience with them. I have a friend that says it is pretty good, and he uses it all the time.

    • (Score: 3, Informative) by The Vocal Minority on Thursday October 19 2023, @02:16AM

      by The Vocal Minority (2765) on Thursday October 19 2023, @02:16AM (#1329350) Journal

      I find the free version of ChatGPT very useful for writing code - but I am not a software engineer and only program occasionally for very specific tasks. I find that if I ask for something very specific, say manipulating a specific data structure in a way that I am not familiar with, it is very good and seldom wrong - although the code it produces can look a little odd. If I ask it to do something big and complex, it almost always fails in ways that are difficult to debug.