Slash Boxes

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 17 submissions in the queue.
posted by girlwhowaspluggedout on Tuesday March 11 2014, @09:15PM   Printer-friendly
from the i-thought-those-perks-were-meant-to-keep-us-at-the-office-until-dawn dept.

lhsi writes:

"Research done by the Free University of Bozen-Bolzanohas in Italy concluded that happy software developers are better at solving analytical problems. 'Even simple and short activities', the researchers note, 'may impact the affective states of software developers.'

Many large software companies have been providing various perks to developers, hoping that they will become more productive. Based on a study of 42 students from the Faculty of Computer Science, this research seems to validate that practice. Its findings suggest that 'the happiest software developers are more productive in analytical problem solving performance.' This is in contradiction to previous studies, most of which concluding that negative affective states foster analytic problem-solving performance.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by gidds on Wednesday March 12 2014, @01:53PM

    by gidds (589) on Wednesday March 12 2014, @01:53PM (#15256)

    I think that's the Hawthorne Effect [], where workers improve their performance in response to any change in their environment (positive or negative), simply because they know they're being studied.

    A sort of Heisenberg principle for social experiments...

    (Though it seems that some of Hawthorne's initial results may have had other explanations.)

    [sig redacted]
  • (Score: 1) by carguy on Wednesday March 12 2014, @03:19PM

    by carguy (568) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday March 12 2014, @03:19PM (#15315)

    Bingo, this section of the Hawthorne entry was particularly interesting, Interpretation and Criticism [].