Dan Goodin of Ars Technica writes about a newly-discovered hacking platform recently revealed by Kaspersky.
They are labeling the operators 'Equation Group,' and multiple zero-day exploits in the malware kit appear to be related to those which were used by Stuxnet to hack Iran's Natanz nuclear facility in 2010. It is by far the most advanced malware ever discovered, going so far as to flash malicious firmware on the hard disks of no fewer than 12 vendors. Much of the malware was distributed through usual channels such as Java vulnerabilities or ad networks, but it was even found on CDs which were mailed to attendees of a conference in Houston in 2009 which were intercepted and modified to deliver the malicious payload.
The sophistication of the operations and the malware itself leave little doubt that Equation Group is is a state-sponsored organization. The scariest part of it might be that the operation is over 14 years old and unfortunately, much of the malware is yet to be reverse-engineered. Kaspersky has been reaching out to white hats for further assistance in determining the nature and capabilities of the software.
(Score: 5, Insightful) by goody on Tuesday February 17 2015, @01:57PM
It would be a foolish assumption. Of the tens of thousands of government employees of any particular country, just how many realistically could be involved in this sort of activity? 0.001%? It's a bit of a stretch to say if you work for the government you're a criminal. For every one of these so-called criminals there's undoubtedly a few thousand employees who perform mundane tasks like open mail and stamp forms all day or provide vital services that you depend on.
(Score: 5, Touché) by morgauxo on Tuesday February 17 2015, @02:40PM
"just how many realistically could be involved in this sort of activity"
I guess that depends on where you set the bar for 'involved'. Do you work some sort of supporting roll for a government which does this? Then to a degree (perhaps very small) you are involved. Actually.. do you even have to work for them? Do you pay taxes? Do you vote? If yes to either than by some meaning of 'involved' you ARE involved!
Have a nice day you black hatted criminal!
(Score: 2, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday February 17 2015, @03:25PM
Do you read SoylentNews? Then you are generating traffic and thus income for internet providers who pay taxes. I leave the conclusion as exercise to the reader.
(Score: 1, Redundant) by halcyon1234 on Tuesday February 17 2015, @06:39PM
Sorry, but I don't take orders from fucking filthy criminals like you... you SoylentNews reading shitstain.
Original Submission [thedailywtf.com]
(Score: 4, Insightful) by Thexalon on Tuesday February 17 2015, @04:24PM
I'd say, at minimum, to be involved in a crime you must:
1. Be aware that it is happening.
2. If you are obligated to report that it is happening, fail to do so (unless you are coerced into remaining silent e.g. by threats to your life or family).
3. If you are not obligated to report that it is happening, take some sort of action that supports the criminal undertaking (again, unless you are coerced into that action).
For example, I'd consider it extremely unlikely that the vast majority of people who work for the Department of Agriculture had anything to do with this crime, and thus should be held blameless for it. And those involved solely because they pay their taxes or vote are absolved either by not knowing about it (almost everybody) or being coerced into it because the IRS can take your stuff at gunpoint if you don't pay your taxes (everybody else).
Vote for Pedro
(Score: 3, Funny) by DECbot on Tuesday February 17 2015, @06:37PM
I see where this is going....
I'd say, at minimum, to be involved in a crime you must:
1. Be aware that it is happening.
2. If you are obligated to report that it is happening, fail to do so (unless you are coerced into remaining silent e.g. by threats to your life or family).
3. If you are not obligated to report that it is happening, take some sort of action that supports the criminal undertaking (again, unless you are coerced into that action).
4. ???
5. Profit!
cats~$ sudo chown -R us /home/base
(Score: 3, Insightful) by Nobuddy on Tuesday February 17 2015, @07:29PM
Reporting the government's criminal activity is a crime.
(Score: 1) by art guerrilla on Wednesday February 18 2015, @01:23AM
"1. Be aware that it is happening."
uh oh, that has several bad, bad, bad results:
1. so, as long as the eee-vil is distributed enough so that each participant has only a teeny, tiny piece of (ambiguous?) eee-vil to do, then everything is jake ? ? ? no, i don't think so...
2. so, as long as the eee-vil is buried deep enough, covered up enough, or otherwise goes unnoticed, then we are cool ? ? ? no, i don't think so...
also, i guess it is hardly unexpected, but the original poster who make the flippant and hyperbolic comment OBVIOUSLY not meant to be taken TECHNICALLY seriously, has spawned a bunch of 'but what about a file clerk sorting form 12Q-stroke-Z-dash-49's, are they eee-vil ? ? ?' well, i don't know, maybe form 12Q-stroke-Z-dash-49 is the form which gets you on the extra-judicial ASSASSINATION list, but they don't know that... are they still 'doing eee-vil' ? ? ? (see above)
i think the larger point they were making (AND i feel is getting to the point of validity), is EVERYONE working in the gummint becomes guilty by association of furthering a vast kriminal enterprise (AKA Empire)... i mean, people who are nobodies in real organized crime/mafia scenarios are 'just as guilty' as those who do the actual hits, isn't that how the 'law'' treats them ? ? ? why shouldn't ALL gummint employees be subject to that same line of thinking: they are KNOWINGLY associating with a vast kriminal konspiracy, so it doesn't matter if they are delivering coffee and donuts for them, they are 'just as guilty', richtig ? ? ?
(Score: 2) by Hairyfeet on Tuesday February 17 2015, @04:32PM
Uhhhh...not trying to Godwin but isn't that the same argument used by the Germans after the war?
ACs are never seen so don't bother. Always ready to show SJWs for the racists they are.
(Score: 2) by goody on Tuesday February 17 2015, @05:22PM
Yea, and Hitler wore pants and so does the President, so the US government is full of Nazis.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday February 17 2015, @06:34PM
Only if the pants are brown.
(Score: 2) by halcyon1234 on Tuesday February 17 2015, @06:40PM
Well then, maybe you shouldn't be so uptight about electing a woman president.
Original Submission [thedailywtf.com]
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday February 17 2015, @11:19PM
One wonders of whom you might be thinking.
Perhaps yet another warmonger with no real new ideas.
Hillary-orange-pant-suit [gopthedailydose.com]
You folks had a chance to vote for a great woman back in 2012. [wikipedia.org]
A physician who, when she debated Mitt Romney in 2002, beat the pants off of him. [google.com]
...a gal with with actual new ideas. [wikipedia.org]
Jill Stein, Green Party [abetterworld.tv]
Jill Stein, Green Party [somd.com]
Similar deal for 2008. [wikipedia.org]
Cynthia McKinney, Green Party [reopen911.info]
Cynthia McKinney, Green Party [wordpress.com]
-- gewg_
(Score: 2) by Hairyfeet on Tuesday February 17 2015, @08:46PM
You can try to hand wave it away but try reading it again...
"Of the tens of thousands of government employees of any particular country, just how many realistically could be involved in this sort of activity? 0.001%? It's a bit of a stretch to say if you work for the government you're a criminal. For every one of these so-called criminals there's undoubtedly a few thousand employees who perform mundane tasks like open mail and stamp forms all day"
Now are you REALLY gonna try to sit here and argue that isn't ringing ANY bells?
ACs are never seen so don't bother. Always ready to show SJWs for the racists they are.
(Score: 2) by goody on Wednesday February 18 2015, @12:16AM
I'm arguing that it's rather inane to claim anyone who works for the government is a criminal, regardless of whatever far-reaching connections you're attempting to make. If you think you can prove that it's reasonable to assume everyone working for the government is a criminal like the OP, have at it.
(Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday February 17 2015, @05:29PM
Turn this around: let's say that you're just opening mail and stamping forms for a criminal organization, or you're just the driver for the big honcho...
Will the powers that be consider you as 'involved'? Will they file charges against you?
I am all for reciprocal diplomacy: if you will fuck me over in this way, I too can fuck you over in the same way.