prospectacle writes:
"An important choice remains for this site. What kind of organisation will we be, practically, legally and financially?
A for-profit, shareholder corporation seems out of the question, by general consensus (correct me if I'm wrong), but other questions remain. The basic choice is this:
Will we be like a charity, a co-op, or a recreational club?
This is a gross simplification, but gives some idea of the options involved. Feel free to offer alternatives. So what should we be, what is our purpose, really? And what kind of a structure is required to make sure we serve that purpose, and that money doesn't end up in the wrong pockets?
Bonus question: which jurisdiction should we set ourselves up in to fulfil our mission most effectively?"
(Score: 2) by hemocyanin on Wednesday March 12 2014, @03:00PM
I think I like 2(b) the best. I'm not involved with this site in any manner beyond user, but, I think that 2(b) would encourage those who are doing the heavy lifting of making it available, to do the best work they can because of the opportunity for distributed personal profit amongst the workers. This is also increases the incentive for the site workers to prevent any single person from wresting control of the site, and secondly, it doesn't create a situation where some corporate overlord torpedos everything for extreme concentrated personal profit at the expense of users and site workers.
I feel I would benefit because the site workers would feel greater motivation to keep the site going, rather than experience charity burnout or any of the stuff surrounding that ("it was fun but I need to earn a living" -- "it was fun but I have a real job and a family and need the time back" -- "it isn't fun and I'm not getting paid so fuck it").