Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 10 submissions in the queue.
posted by janrinok on Friday November 22, @12:01AM   Printer-friendly
from the all-boxes-on-all-forms-must-be-checked dept.

SpaceX's Shotwell Says US Regulators Must 'Go Faster'

SpaceX President Gwynne Shotwell fired off fresh criticism at US regulators on Friday, saying rocket launch approvals need to catch up with the pace her company is innovating.

[....] Elon Musk's rocket and satellite company plans to launch the sixth major test of its new Starship vehicle on Tuesday, and sees as many as 400 launches of the moon and Mars craft over the next four years, Shotwell said. That compares with a record 148 missions that US regulators authorized for the entire commercial space industry in the government's most recent fiscal year.

[....] In September, Musk, SpaceX's founder and Chief Executive Officer, called on the head of the FAA to resign and claimed that government paperwork to license a launch takes longer than building the actual rocket.

On Thursday, the FAA said it plans to update its launch and reentry licensing rule, as the number of space operations could more than double by 2028, it said.

What did FAA do back when aircraft were new and novel, and could be dangerous?


Original Submission

 
This discussion was created by janrinok (52) for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Tork on Friday November 22, @01:04AM

    by Tork (3914) Subscriber Badge on Friday November 22, @01:04AM (#1382798)

    So? SpaceX is using a thousand tonnes of LNG to launch a fucking rocket over our heads, manufacturing times are not a factor for how long the bureaucracy takes.

    Flamebait?! Look, if he had said "Here's a specific area that could be improved by..." I'd be way off base... and I'd look stupid because that would have been a productive line of discussion. However, in this case he's bitching about the process using a completely irrelevant metric that really only appeals to ... heh... ppl who'd mod a remark like mine flamebait.

    --
    🏳️‍🌈 Proud Ally 🏳️‍🌈
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   0  
       Flamebait=1, Troll=2, Insightful=3, Total=6
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   1