Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Monday March 02 2015, @08:15AM   Printer-friendly
from the it's-a-different-equality dept.

The Los Angeles Times is running an article describing the challenges faced by Asian Americans as they apply for acceptance to top colleges.

The article describes the impact that their race and ethnicity has on their SAT scores:

Lee's next slide shows three columns of numbers from a Princeton University study that tried to measure how race and ethnicity affect admissions by using SAT scores as a benchmark. It uses the term “bonus” to describe how many extra SAT points an applicant's race is worth.

She points to the first column. African Americans received a “bonus” of 230 points, Lee says.

She points to the second column. “Hispanics received a bonus of 185 points.”

The last column draws gasps. Asian Americans, Lee says, are penalized by 50 points — in other words, they had to do that much better to win admission.

“Do Asians need higher test scores? Is it harder for Asians to get into college? The answer is yes,” Lee says.

A core tenet of the American philosophy, even from before the days of the Founding Fathers, is that through hard work and excellence one should be able to obtain success in life. But is this ideal even possible when certain underachieving groups are given artificial advantages, while those with the most merit are artificially held back?

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Monday March 02 2015, @02:27PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday March 02 2015, @02:27PM (#151874)

    None of which would affect the validity of his arguments.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +1  
       Insightful=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   1  
  • (Score: 2) by Reziac on Tuesday March 03 2015, @06:04PM

    by Reziac (2489) on Tuesday March 03 2015, @06:04PM (#152658) Homepage

    If one thinks the poster's race, gender, orientation, or religion affects the validity of his arguments -- how is that not racism?

    Flip it around. Does "black, female, lesbian, pagan" sound like it should affect same?

    If that inverse makes you sputter with indignation, consider that it's an invalid criterion in BOTH directions.

    --
    And there is no Alkibiades to come back and save us from ourselves.