Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Wednesday March 04 2015, @12:07PM   Printer-friendly
from the one-rule-for-them dept.

The NY Times reports that Hillary Rodham Clinton exclusively used a personal email account to conduct government business as secretary of state, according to State Department officials. She may have violated federal requirements that officials' correspondence be retained as part of the agency's record.

Clinton did not have a government email address during her four-year tenure at the State Department. Her aides took no actions to have her personal emails preserved on department servers at the time, as required by the Federal Records Act. "It is very difficult to conceive of a scenario — short of nuclear winter — where an agency would be justified in allowing its cabinet-level head officer to solely use a private email communications channel for the conduct of government business," said attorney Jason R. Baron. A spokesman for Clinton defended her use of the personal email account and said she has been complying with the "letter and spirit of the rules."

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday March 04 2015, @06:05PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday March 04 2015, @06:05PM (#153168)

    I would trust my email with google before I would trust it with a personal server when you are responsible for every tiny security detail.

    Frankly the idea that someone with sensitive email should use an email service providers whose entire business model is based on snooping your email is ridiculous.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +1  
       Insightful=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   1  
  • (Score: 2) by urza9814 on Thursday March 05 2015, @01:36PM

    by urza9814 (3954) on Thursday March 05 2015, @01:36PM (#153487) Journal

    Frankly the idea that someone with sensitive email should use an email service providers whose entire business model is based on snooping your email is ridiculous.

    I guess that explains why she wasn't using the government provided email address then....