Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 14 submissions in the queue.
posted by LaminatorX on Monday March 17 2014, @03:54AM   Printer-friendly
from the head-in-the-sand dept.

Fluffeh writes:

"For a few years the National Research Council, National Science Teachers Association, and the American Association for the Advancement of Science have been working to put together a set of standards for teaching science in public education schools. So far, nine states and the District of Columbia have adopted the standards. Wyoming doesn't appear to have issues with evolution. Instead, climate science appears to be the problem. That's not because any of the legislators have actually studied the science involved and found it lacking. The issue appears to be solely with the implications of the science.

State Representative Matt Teeters had this to say '[The standards] handle global warming as settled science. There's all kind of social implications involved in that that I don't think would be good for Wyoming.' Specifically, Teeters seems to think that having citizens of the state accept climate science would 'wreck Wyoming's economy,' which relies heavily on fossil fuel production."

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by wjwlsn on Monday March 17 2014, @02:30PM

    by wjwlsn (171) on Monday March 17 2014, @02:30PM (#17608) Homepage Journal

    Fourier called, basic chemistry is not a debate. (anymore)

    You don't even know what I believe about climate change or global warming, and I'm not going to enlighten you. However, that is an interesting statement you just made... Suppose there was some major new discovery that had the potential to change our understanding of basic chemistry -- or of any other science that currently seems set in stone -- would you still say that it's not up for debate?

    --
    I am a traveler of both time and space. Duh.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2