Paul Schreiber blogs about the tech behind the websites of presidential candidates. "So, you want to run a country. Can you hire someone who can run a website? ...Here's how the (declared) candidates' sites fare." There's a table comparing 4 candidates' sites based on HTTPS, URL permutations, IPv6, SSL rating, and other related qualities. Schreiber mentions that he will "update this as more candidates declare or sites change."
From the blog comments
HillaryClinton.com was using IIS (and no https) until Sunday morning, when they switched over.
(Score: 1, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday April 18 2015, @02:45AM
What's wrong with using IIS? Modern versions are very capable and robust.
(Score: 4, Funny) by Tork on Saturday April 18 2015, @03:05AM
Slashdolt Logic: "25 year old jokes about sharks and lasers are +5, Funny." 💩
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday April 18 2015, @03:13AM
Are you trying to be funny?
(Score: 2) by kaszz on Saturday April 18 2015, @10:30AM
No, he tries to show that operating systems from Microsoft puts the user in impossible situations and generally causes problems than need not to be. So one should not use it.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday April 18 2015, @12:02PM
You've been Poe'd. Read the last sentence again.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday April 18 2015, @12:26PM
Once upon a midnight dreary,
while I pondered, weak and weary,
Over many a quaint and curious volume of forgotten lore,
While I nodded, nearly napping,
suddenly there came a tapping,
As of some one gently rapping,
rapping at my chamber door.
"Suck my rock hard cock you dirty skanky whore!"